Legally Free Or. After hrg. Dep Review/ (DPRHP, ORPP) Page 1 of 7 Permanency Planning WPF JU 03.0560 (07/2018) JuCR 3.9; RCW 13.34.130, .136, .138, .145 Superior Court of Washington County of Juvenile Court In re the Dependency of: DOB: NO. Legally Free - Order after Hearing Dependency Review (DPRHO) Permanency Planning (ORPP) Clerk222s Action Required. Paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, and the boxes below. The court will hear interim review dependency review permanency planning: (type of hearing) on (date) at a.m./p.m. at: Court, Room/Department: , located at: . Additional Clerk222s Action Required: Enter the code(s) that apply. About today222s hearing: Was adequate and timely notice given to the child222s caregiver? Yes (CGATN) No (CGNATN) Did the court receive a caregiver report? Yes (CGRR) / No The caregiver appeared. Did the court give the caregiver an opportunity to be heard? Yes / No I. Hearing 1.1 The court held a hearing on: . 1.2 The following persons appeared at the hearing: Child Child's Lawyer Child's GAL/CASA GAL/CASA's Lawyer Social Worker Assistant Attorney General Tribal Representative Current Caregiver Other 1.3 Testimony was taken. See Clerk222s Minutes. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Legally Free Or. After hrg. Dep Review/ (DPRHP, ORPP) Page 2 of 7 Permanency Planning WPF JU 03.0560 (07/2018) JuCR 3.9; RCW 13.34.130, .136, .138, .145 II. Findings 2.1 Indian status: There is reason to know the child is an Indian child as defined in RCW 13.38.040 and 25 U.S.C. 247 1903(4), based upon prior findings and orders. The Federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Acts apply to this proceeding. All notice requirements and evidentiary requirements under the Federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Acts have been satisfied. There is not a reason to know the child is an Indian child as defined in RCW 13.38.040 and 25 U.S.C. 247 1903(4), and the Federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Acts do not apply to this proceeding. 2.2 The child222s current caregiver was informed of this proceeding and his or her right to be heard by the court as required by Chapter 13.34 RCW. 2.3 The child is 12 years or older and the court made the inquiry required by RCW 13.34.100(6). 2.4 An order terminating the parent-child relationship was entered on as to the mother and on as to the father. The child has been legally free for months. Child has been legally free for six months or greater and an attorney has been appointed has not been appointed. 2.5 In the previous review period, the permanent plan of care in effect for the child has been: Primary: Alternative: Adoption. Final non-parental custody order pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW or the equivalent laws of another state or a federally recognized Indian Tribe. Guardianship. Long-term relative or foster care, for children between 16 and 18 years of age, with a written agreement. Responsible living skills program; and/or Independent living for children 16 and older. 2.6 The placement and permanent plan: are still necessary and appropriate for the safety and wellbeing of the child. are no longer necessary and appropriate and the placement shall be modified as stated in Paragraph 3.4. are no longer necessary and appropriate and the permanent plan shall be modified as stated in Paragraph 3.6. have been accomplished because the court entered an adoption, guardianship, or nonparental custody decree, which is in the child222s best interests, and which implements the permanent plan of care. long-term foster or relative care has been achieved. 2.7 The primary permanent plan of care for the child has has not been achieved: For the reasons set forth in the agency222s report; and/or American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Legally Free Or. After hrg. Dep Review/ (DPRHP, ORPP) Page 3 of 7 Permanency Planning WPF JU 03.0560 (07/2018) JuCR 3.9; RCW 13.34.130, .136, .138, .145 Other: . 2.8 The permanency plan is is not appropriate. The circumstances that prevent achieving a permanency plan for the child are: appeal. as set forth in DCYF222s report. Other: . 2.9 is the projected date for: placement for adoption. establishment of a guardianship. establishment of a non-parental custody. implementation of the following alternate plan of care: . 2.10 The child is 16 years old or older and the court has approved a permanency plan other than Return Home, Adoption, Title 13 Guardianship, or final non-parental custody order pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW for the following compelling reasons: . 2.11 The child is 14 years old or older and the court makes the following findings: The child was present for today222s hearing. The court consulted with the child in an age-appropriate manner regarding ongoing opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate activities. The child was not present for today222s hearing. The child does does not have regular, ongoing opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate activities. DCYF has taken the following steps to ensure the child222s placement is following the reasonable and prudent parent standard as defined 42 U.S.C. 247675(10(A): . 2.12 Reasonable efforts have have not been made by DCYF to implement and finalize the permanent plan of care for the child as detailed in the agency222s report. 2.13 The child is presently under the care, custody, and control of DCYF. The child has been residing in out-of-home care since . The child has been residing in foster care relative care with a suitable person. There is a continuing need for out-of-home placement because the permanent plan has not been finalized. 2.14 The child is in an adoptive placement and is expected to remain there until adopted. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Legally Free Or. After hrg. Dep Review/ (DPRHP, ORPP) Page 4 of 7 Permanency Planning WPF JU 03.0560 (07/2018) JuCR 3.9; RCW 13.34.130, .136, .138, .145 2.15 The child is is not in a safe and appropriate placement that adequately meets all his or her physical, emotional, cultural, and educational needs. 2.16 DCYF has has not considered out-of-state placements for the child. There are no appropriate out-of-state placements at this time. Other: . 2.17 The agency has has not complied with the court-ordered services and responsibilities. 2.18 The child has has not complied with the court-ordered services and responsibilities. 2.19 The agency report was was not timely submitted. The agency plan is is not contested. 2.20 The youth is 17 years old and a transition plan meeting has occurred has not occurred. 2.21 The court has considered the child222s relationships with the child222s siblings in accordance with RCW 13.34.130(3). Reasonable efforts have been made to ensure visits and contact between siblings have have not been made. Reasonable efforts to ensure visits and contact between siblings have not been made because there is reasonable cause to believe that the best interests of the child or siblings would be jeopardized. 2.22 The court has considered the child222s relationship with others and visits have been have not been ordered. 2.23 Other: . PERMANENCY PLANNING HEARING (to be used only as specified in RCW 13.34.145). 2.24 The court has has not consulted with the child in an age-appropriate manner about the proposed permanency or transition plan. 2.25 The child is age 14 years old or older and the court makes the following findings: The child was present for today222s hearing. The court asked the child about the child222s desired permanency outcome and consulted with the child in an age-appropriate manner about the proposed permanency and transition plan. The child was not present for today222s hearing. DCYF consulted with the child regarding the child222s proposed permanency and transition plan. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Legally Free Or. After hrg. Dep Review/ (DPRHP, ORPP) Page 5 of 7 Permanency Planning WPF JU 03.0560 (07/2018) JuCR 3.9; RCW 13.34.130, .136, .138, .145 The following services are needed to assist the child in transitioning to successful adulthood: . 2.26 The permanency plan identifies independent living as a goal and services should be provided to assist the ch