Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Attachment Additional Findings And Orders For Minor Approaching Majority-Delinquency Form. This is a California form and can be use in Juvenile Judicial Council.
Loading PDF...
Tags: Attachment Additional Findings And Orders For Minor Approaching Majority-Delinquency, JV-680, California Judicial Council, Juvenile
JV-680
CASE NUMBER:
MINOR'S NAME:
ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS FOR MINOR APPROACHING MAJORITY—DELINQUENCY
Use this form to document the juvenile court’s findings and orders regarding the possible modification of jurisdiction over the minor
from delinquency jurisdiction to transition jurisdiction or dependency jurisdiction, the minor’s plans for independent living, and his or
her status as a nonminor dependent as set forth in Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.812, at the following hearings:
1. A review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 held on behalf of a minor approaching majority.
2. A review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court
jurisdiction is considered, held on behalf of a minor more than 17 years, 5 months and less than 18 years of age; or
3. Any other hearing, during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court jurisdiction is considered, held on behalf of a
minor more than 17 years, 5 months and less than 18 years of age who is in a foster care placement or who was subject to an
order for a foster care placement as a dependent when he or she was adjudged to be a ward.
BASED ON THE REPORTS READ, CONSIDERED, AND ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AND ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED,
THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS:
Findings:
1. a.
The minor’s rehabilitative goals have been met. Juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a ward is no longer required.
The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record.
b.
2.
The minor’s rehabilitative goals have not been met. Continued juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a ward is
required. The facts supporting this finding are stated on the record.
For a dual status minor for whom dependency jurisdiction was suspended under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(A):
a.
b.
3.
A return to the minor’s home would be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a
dependent should be resumed. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record.
A return to the minor’s home would not be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as
a dependent does not need to be resumed. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record.
For a dual status minor for whom the probation department was designated the lead agency under
Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(B):
a.
b.
4.
A return to the minor’s home would be detrimental to the minor, and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a
dual status child is no longer required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record.
A return to the minor’s home would not be detrimental to the minor, and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as
a dependent is not required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record.
For other than a dual status minor:
a.
The minor was not a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward.
The minor
does
and
cannot
record.
b.
can
does not appear to come within the description of Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300
be returned home safely. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the
The minor was subject to an order for a foster care placement as a dependent of the court at the time he or she
was adjudged a ward and
does
does not
remain within the description of a dependent child
under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 and a return to the home of his or her parents or legal guardian
would
would not
create a substantial risk of detriment to the minor’s safety, protection, or
physical or emotional well-being. The facts supporting the findings were stated on the record.
c.
Reunification services
d.
The minor’s case
a guardianship.
e.
The minor
does
does not
setting as a nonminor dependent.
have
has
have not
has not
been terminated.
been set for a hearing to terminate parental rights or establish
intend to sign a mutual agreement for a placement in a supervised
Page 1 of 4
Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California
JV-680 [Rev. July 1, 2012]
ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS
FOR MINOR APPROACHING MAJORITY—DELINQUENCY
Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 450, 451,
607.2, 727.2(i)–(j), 778;
Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.812
www.courts.ca.gov
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
JV-680
MINOR'S NAME:
The minor’s Transitional Independent Living Case Plan includes a plan for the minor to satisfy the following conditions of
eligibility to remain under juvenile court jurisdiction as a nonminor dependent:
5.
a.
b.
c.
The minor plans to continue attending high school or a high school equivalency certificate (GED) program.
The minor plans to attend a college, a community college, or a vocational education program.
The minor plans to take part in a program or activities to promote employment or overcome barriers to
employment.
The minor plans to be employed at least 80 hours a month.
The minor may not be able to attend school, college, a vocational program, a program or activities to promote
employment or overcome barriers to employment, or to work 80 hours per month due to a medical condition.
d.
e.
The minor’s Transitional Independent Living Case Plan includes an alternative plan for the minor’s transition to
independence, including housing, education, employment, and a support system in the event the minor does not remain
under juvenile court jurisdiction after attaining 18 years of age.
6.
7.
CASE NUMBER:
For an Indian child, he or she
does
does not
intend to continue to be considered an Indian child for the
purposes of the ongoing application of the Indian Child Welfare Act to him or her as a nonminor dependent.
The minor has an in-progress application pending for title XVI Supplemental Security Income benefits, and the continuation of
juvenile court jurisdiction until a final decision has been issued to ensure continued assistance with the application process
8.
a.
is in the child's best interest.
b.
is not in the child's best interest as it is not necessary.
9.
The minor has an in-progress application pending for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status or other application for legal
residency for which an active juvenile court case is required.
10.
The potential benefits of remaining under juvenile court jurisdiction as a nonminor dependent were explained to the minor
and the minor has stated that he or she understands those benefits.
11.
The minor was informed that he or she may decline to become a nonminor dependent.
12.
The minor was informed that on reaching 18 years of age, he or she may have the right to have juvenile court jurisdiction
terminated following a hearing under rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court.
13.
The minor has been informed that if juvenile court jurisdiction is terminated, he or she may have the right to file a request
to return to foster care and have the court resume jurisdiction over him or her as a nonminor dependent.
14. a.
b.
All the information, documents, and services required by Welf. & Inst. Code, § 391(e) have been provided to the minor.
Not all the information, documents, and services required by Welf. & Inst. Code, § 391(e) have been provided to the minor
(1)
(2)
15.
The barriers to providing any missing information, documents, or services can be overcome by the date the
minor attains 18 years of age.
The barriers to providing any missing information, documents or services may not be overcome by the date
the minor attains 18 years of age.
The minor
JV-680 [Rev. July 1, 2012]
was
was not
provided with the notices and information required under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 607.5.
ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS FOR WARD
APPROACHING MAJORITY—DELINQUENCY
Page 2 of 4
JV-680
MINOR’S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
Orders:
16.
The court having previously determined that the minor is a dual status child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(A) and
that juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent should be resumed, orders:
a. Dependency jurisdiction over the minor previously suspended is resumed and delinquency jurisdiction is dismissed.
b. The matter is continued for a status review hearing set under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21 or § 366.3 on the date stated
on the record which is within six months of the date of the minor’s most recent status review hearing under Welf. & Inst.
Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3.
17.
he court having previously determined that the minor is a dual status child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(B), that
the minor’s rehabilitative goals were achieved, that a return to the minor’s home would be detrimental, and that juvenile
court jurisdiction over the minor as a dual status child is no longer required, orders:
a. The child's dual status is terminated, delinquency jurisdiction over the minor is dismissed, and dependency jurisdiction is
continued with the child welfare services department responsible for the minor’s placement and care.
b. The matter is continued for a status review hearing set under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21 or § 366.3 on the date stated
on the record which is within six months of the date of the minor's most recent status review hearing under Welf. & Inst.
Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3.
18.
The minor comes within the juvenile court’s transition jurisdiction as described in Welf. & Inst. Code, § 450.
a. The minor was originally removed from the physical custody of his or her parents or legal guardians on
(specify date): ______________ and continues to be removed from their custody.
b. The removal findings made at that hearing, “continuation in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare” and “reasonable
efforts were made to prevent removal,” remain in effect.
c. The
child welfare services department
placement and care.
probation department
is responsible for the minor’s
The minor is adjudged a transition dependent pending his or her attaining the age of 18 years and assuming the status of a
nonminor dependent under the transition jurisdiction of this court. The matter is continued for a status review hearing set
under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.903 on the date stated on the record which is within six months of the minor’s most recent
status review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3.
19.
The minor (1) was not a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward; (2) is currently subject to an order for a
foster care placement; (3) does not come within the juvenile court’s transition jurisdiction; (4) has achieved his or her
rehabilitative goals; (5) no longer requires delinquency jurisdiction; and (6) appears to come within the description of Welf. &
Inst. Code, § 300 and cannot be returned home safely.
a. The
probation officer
minor’s attorney
must submit an application, under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 329,
to the child welfare services department to commence a proceeding to declare the minor a dependent of the court.
b. The matter is set for a hearing to review the child welfare services department’s decision on the date stated on the
record which is within 20 court days of the date of this order.
JV-680 [Rev. July 1, 2012]
ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS FOR WARD
APPROACHING MAJORITY—DELINQUENCY
Page 3 of 4
JV-680
MINOR’S NAME:
20.
CASE NUMBER:
The minor (1) was a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward; (2) does not come within the juvenile court’s
transition jurisdiction; (3) has achieved his or her rehabilitative goals; (4) no longer requires delinquency jurisdiction; and (5)
remains within the description of a dependent child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 and a return to the home of a parent or
legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to his or her safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being.
a. The minor was originally removed from the physical custody of his or her parents or legal guardians on
(specify date): ______________ and continues to be removed from their custody.
b. The removal findings made at that hearing, “continuation in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare” and “reasonable
efforts were made to prevent removal,” remain in effect.
c. The
and care.
child welfare services department
probation department
is responsible for the minor’s placement
The order terminating jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent of the juvenile court is vacated and dependency jurisdiction
over the minor is resumed. Delinquency jurisdiction is terminated. The matter is continued for a status review hearing set
under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.903 on the date stated on the record which is within six months of the minor’s most recent
status review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3.
21.
Jurisdiction over the minor is not modified from delinquency jurisdiction to dependency jurisdiction or transition jurisdiction:
a.
The minor is returned to the home of the parent or legal guardian. A progress report hearing is set on the date
stated on the record.
b.
The minor is returned to the home of the parent or legal guardian and juvenile court jurisdiction of the minor is
terminated as set forth in Petition to Terminate Wardship and Order (form JV-794).
c.
Delinquency jurisdiction is continued and the order for an out-of-home placement in a non–foster care placement
remains in full force and effect. A progress report hearing is set on the date stated on the record.
d.
Delinquency jurisdiction is continued and the order for a foster care placement remains in full force and effect.
(1)
(2)
The minor intends to meet the eligibility requirements for status as a nonminor dependent after
attaining 18 years of age and a status review hearing is set under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.903 on
the date stated on the record which is within six months of the minor’s most recent status review
hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3.
The minor does not intend to meet the eligibility requirements for status as a nonminor dependent after
attaining 18 years of age.
(a)
(b)
JV-680 [Rev. July 1, 2012]
A hearing to terminate delinquency jurisdiction under Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 607.2(b)(4) and
607.3 is set for the date stated on the record which is within one month of the minor’s 18th
birthday.
A status review hearing is set under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2. on the date stated on the
record which is within six months of the minor’s most recent status review hearing under
Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3.
ATTACHMENT: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS FOR WARD
APPROACHING MAJORITY—DELINQUENCY
Page 4 of 4