JV-681 MINOR'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: ATTACHMENT: HEARING FOR DISMISSAL--ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS--FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT--DELINQUENCY Use this form to document the juvenile court's findings and orders regarding the possible modification of jurisdiction over a minor who is 17 years, 5 months of age or younger from that of a ward to that of a dependent at the following hearings: 1. A review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3 held on behalf of a minor 17 years, 5 months of age or younger, during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court jurisdiction is considered. 2. Any other hearing held on behalf of a minor 17 years, 5 months of age or younger who is in a foster care placement, during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court jurisdiction is considered. 3. Any hearing held on behalf of a minor who is not currently in a foster care placement but was in such a placement when he or she was adjudged a ward, during which a recommendation to terminate juvenile court jurisdiction is considered. BASED ON THE REPORTS READ, CONSIDERED, AND ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AND ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS: Findings: 1. a. b. The minor's rehabilitative goals have been met. Juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a ward is no longer required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. The minor's rehabilitative goals have not been met. Continued juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a ward is required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. For a dual status minor for whom dependency jurisdiction was suspended under section 241.1(e)(5)(A): a. b. A return to the minor's home would be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent should be resumed. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. A return to the minor's home would not be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent does not need to be resumed. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. 2. 3. For a dual status minor for whom the probation department was designated the lead agency under section 241.1(e)(5)(B): a. A return to the minor's home would be detrimental to the minor, and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dual status child is no longer required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. A return to the minor's home would not be detrimental to the minor and juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent is not required. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. b. 4. For a minor other than a dual status minor: a. The minor was not a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward. The minor does does not appear to come within the description of Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 and cannot can be returned home safely. The facts supporting this finding were stated on the record. The minor was subject to an order for a foster care placement as a dependent of the court at the time he or she was adjudged a ward and does does not remain within the description of a dependent child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, and a return to the home of his or her parents or legal guardian would would not create a substantial risk of detriment to the minor's safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being. The facts supporting the findings were stated on the record. b. 5. The minor was was not provided with the notices and information required under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 607.5. Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-681 [Rev July 1, 2012] ATTACHMENT: HEARING FOR DISMISSAL--ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND ORDERS--FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT--DELINQUENCY Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 607.2, 727.2(i), 778; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.812 www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com JV-681 MINOR'S NAME: CASE NUMBER: Orders: 6. The court having previously determined that the minor is a dual status child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(A) and that juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dependent should be resumed, orders: a. Dependency jurisdiction over the minor previously suspended is resumed and delinquency jurisdiction is dismissed. b. The matter is continued for a status review hearing set under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21 or § 366.3 on the date stated on the record which is within six months of the date of the minor's most recent status review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3. 7. The court having previously determined that the minor is a dual status child under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1(e)(5)(B), that the child's rehabilitative goals were achieved, that a return to the minor's home would be detrimental, and that juvenile court jurisdiction over the minor as a dual status child is no longer required, orders: a. The child's dual status is terminated, delinquency jurisdiction over the minor is dismissed, and dependency jurisdiction is continued with the child welfare services department responsible for the child's placement and care. b. The matter is continued for a status review hearing set under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21 or § 366.3 on the date stated on the record which is within six months of the date of the minor's most recent status review hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 727.2 or § 727.3. 8. The minor (1) was not a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward; (2) is currently subject to an order for a foster care placement; (3) does not come within the juvenile court's transition jurisdiction; (4) has achieved his or her rehabilitative goals; (5) no longer requires delinquency jurisdiction; and (6) appears to come within the description of Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 and cannot return home safely. a. The probation officer minor's attorney must submit an application, under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 329, to the county child welfare services department to commence a proceeding to declare the minor a dependent of the court. b. The matter is set for a hearing to review the county child welfare services department's decision on the date stated on the record which is within 20 court days of the date of this order. 9. The minor (1) was a court dependent at the time he or she was declared a ward; (2) does not come within the juvenile court's transition jurisdiction; (3) has achieved his or her rehabilitative goals; (4) delinquency jurisdiction is no longer