Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Findings And Orders After Hearing To Modify Delinquency Jurisdiction Form. This is a California form and can be use in Juvenile Judicial Council.
Loading PDF...
Tags: Findings And Orders After Hearing To Modify Delinquency Jurisdiction, JV-683, California Judicial Council, Juvenile
JV-683 Judicial Officer: Bailiff: Court Reporter: Interpreter:Language: Court Clerk: Other Court Personnel: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFBRANCH NAME:CITY AND ZIP CODE:STREET ADDRESS:MAILING ADDRESS: CHILD'S NAME: FOR COURT USE ONLY CASE NUMBER: FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING TO MODIFY DELINQUENCY JURISDICTION TO TRANSITION JURISDICITON FOR WARD OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:STATE:ZIP CODE:CITY:STREET ADDRESS:FIRM NAME:NAME:STATE BAR NO.:TELEPHONE NO.:FAX NO.:E-MAIL ADDRESS:ATTORNEY FOR (name):Page 1 of 4 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-683 [Rev. March 15, 2019]Welfare and Institutions Code, 247247 450, 451; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.813 www.courts.ca.govFINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING TO MODIFY DELINQUENCY JURISDICTION TO TRANSITION JURISDICTION FOR WARD OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OF AGEParent2. Legal guardian (name):3.Tribal representative (name):5.Indian custodian (name):4.a. 6. Other (name):a.b. Father Father Mother Mother Others presentb. Other (name):c. Other (name):(Name):(Name): PresentParties (name)a. 1. Attorney (name): Present Nonminor:d. Other (specify):c. County agency social worker:b. Probation officer: (Name):(Name):a.Report of social worker dated:The court has read and considered and admits into evidence7. d.Other (specify): c.Other (specify): b. Report of probation officer dated:Other (specify): e. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com JV-683 CASE NUMBER: NONMINOR'S NAME:Page 2 of 4 FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING TO MODIFY DELINQUENCY JURISDICTION TO TRANSITION JURISDICTION FOR WARD OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE JV-683 [Rev. March 15, 2019]8. Notice 9. a.c.(4) (3) (1) (2) 10. The ward was removed from the physical custody of his or her parents or legal guardian, adjudged to be a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, and ordered into foster care placement as a ward, or the ward was removed from the custody of his or her parents as a dependent of the court with an order for foster care placement in effect at the time the court adjudged him or her to be a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725.(2) The ward's rehabilitative goals as stated in the case plan have been met, and juvenile court's delinquency jurisdiction over him or her as a ward is no longer required.(3) The ward is a nonminor ward in foster care placement who was a ward subject to an order for foster care placement on the day of his or her 18th birthday and is under the age of 21.(1) BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDSFindings11. 12. 13. The nonminor comes within the description of Welfare and Institutions Code section 450 in that: The ward does not come within the description of Welfare and Institutions Code section 450, in that (select all that apply): The ward was not subject to an order for foster care placement on the day of his or her 18th birthday. The ward is over the age of 21. The ward was not removed from the physical custody of his or her parents or legal guardian, adjudged to be a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, and ordered into foster care placement as a ward, nor was the ward removed from the custody of his or her parents as a dependent of the court with an order for a foster care placement in effect at the time the court adjudged him or her to be a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725. The ward's rehabilitative goals as stated in the case plan have not been met, and the juvenile court's delinquency jurisdiction over him or her as a ward is required. The ward signed a mutual agreement with the responsible agency for placement in a supervised setting as a nonminor dependent. The ward been informed that he or she may decline to become a nonminor dependent and may have juvenile court jurisdiction terminated at a hearing under rule 5.555 of the California Rules of Court. The nonminor informed that if juvenile court jurisdiction is terminated, the nonminor can file a request to return to foster care and may have the court resume jurisdiction over the ward as a nonminor dependent. The benefits of remaining under juvenile court jurisdiction as a nonminor dependent explained . and the nonminor understands them hashas not been given as provided by law. hashas not waswas not werewere not hashas not b.(1) The nonminor comes within the description of Welfare and Institutions Code section 450 in that the young person is under 21 years of age and in a foster care placement based on an adjudication that is subject to vacatur under Penal Code section 236.14. The child was removed from the physical custody of his or her parents or legal guardian, adjudged to be a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, and ordered into foster care placement as a ward, or the child was removed from the custody of his or her parents as a dependent of the court with an order for foster care placement in effect at the time the court adjudged him or her to be a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com The ward was originally removed from the physical custody of his or her parents or legal guardians on (specify date of detention hearing when removal findings were made): and continues to be removed from their custody.Page 3 of 4 JV-683 [Rev. March 15, 2019]FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING TO MODIFY DELINQUENCY JURISDICTION TO TRANSITION JURISDICTION FOR WARD OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OF AGEJV-683 CASE NUMBER: NONMINOR'S NAME:15. The ward had an opportunity to confer with his or her attorney.16.b.The nonminor is adjudged a nonminor dependent under the transition jurisdiction of this court.c.The matter is continued for a nonminor dependent status review hearing set under rule 5.903 of the California Rules of Court on (date): . This date is within six months of the nonminor's most recent status review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 727.2 or 727.3. f. (Insert name): the court as the attorney of record for the nonminor dependent. continues his/her court appointment is appointed bye.Delinquency jurisdiction is terminated.d.(1) The is responsible for the nonminor's placement and care. probation department social services agency(3) The removal findings227"continuance in the home is contrary to the child's welfare" and "reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal"227made at that hearing remain in effect.(2) The court makes the following orders modifying jurisdiction: hashas not 14. The ward's Transitional Independent Living Case Plan include a plan for the ward to satisfy at least one of the following conditions of eligibility to remain under juvenile court jurisdiction as a transition dependent (check all that apply):c. b. a. The ward plans to participate in a program or activities to promote employment or overcome barriers to employment. The ward plans to continue attending high school or a high school equivalency certificate (GED) program. The ward has made plans to attend a college, a community college, or a vocational education program.e. d. The ward may not be able to attend school, college, a vocational program, or a program or activities to promote employment or overcome barriers to employment or to work 80 hours per month due to a medical condition. The ward has made plans to be employed at least 80 hours per month. doesdoes not Continuance in the home is contrary to the child's welfare;a. (1) The is responsible for the nonminor's placement and care. probation department child welfare services department(5) Reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal and the child remains removed from the parent or guardian;(2) The adjudication in petition number is vacated, the petition is dismissed, and the underlying arrest is expunged under Penal Code section 236.14;(3) The Department of Justice and any law enforcement agency that has records of the arrest is ordered to seal those records and then destroy them three years from the date of the arrest or one year