PCV 71 R05-19 -OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCEFresno County Superior Court MandatoryATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address):FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: FAX NO: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 225 COUNTY OF FRESNOCivil Division1130 O StreetFresno, California 93721-2220 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCECASE NUMBER: Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s) Cross-complainant(s) Cross-defendant(s) Other(s)Opposition to request a Pretrial Discovery Conference filed by on . Privilege is the basis for the refusal to produce documents and a privilege log is attached which complies with Local Rule 2.1.17(B).The parties have engaged in the following meaningful meet and confer efforts prior to filing thisopposition:(Describe in detail all meet and confer efforts including any narrowing of the issues or resolutions reached via these efforts.)Local Rule 2.1.17This opposition relates to:A dispute regarding a request for production of documents, set propounded on . A dispute regarding form or special interrogatories, set propounded on . A dispute regarding a deposition subpoena directed at for deposition scheduled for . A dispute regarding a deposition notice, production of documents at a deposition or deposition questions related to the deposition of scheduled for .A dispute regarding monetary, issue, evidence or terminating sanctions related to . American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com PCV-71 R05-19 Fresno County Superior Court MandatoryLocal Rule 2.1.17It is understood that the filing of the Request for a Pretrial Discovery Conference tolls the time for filing amotion to compel discovery on the disputed issues for the number of days between the filing of the requestand issuance by the Court of a subsequent order pertaining to the discovery dispute.Party received the REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE on: Date Pursuant to Local Rule 2.1.17(A)(1), this opposition is being filed within five (5) court days of service of the requestfor a Pretrial Discovery Conference, extended five (5) days for service by mail, and has been served on the opposing party.Opposing Party was served with a copy of the OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE on:Date I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. DateType or Print NameSignature of Party or Attorney for Party OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCEA brief summary of why the requested discovery should be denied, including the facts and legal arguments in support is as follows:(Excepting a privilege log if checked above, no pleadings, exhibits, declarations, or attachmentsshall be attached.) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com