Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Adr Evaluation Form. This is a California form and can be use in Marin Local County.
Loading PDF...
Tags: Adr Evaluation Form, California Local County, Marin
MarinCounty Courts
ADR Evaluation Form
ADR Unit
Marin County Courts - Superior
P. O. Box 4988
San Rafael, CA 94913-4988
This form should be filled out and returned
within 10 days of the resolution of the dispute to:
Judge
No.
1. Case name:
PI/PD-Auto
2. Type of civil case
PI/PD-Other
3. Date complaint filed
Other (specify):
Contract
Date case resolved
4. Date of ADR assessment conference
Amount in controversy (if any)
5. Number of parties
6.
Plaintiff's Attorney
Cross Complainant's Attorney
7.
Defendant's Attorney
NAM E
NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NUMBER
Cross Defendant's Attorney
TELEPHONE NUMBER
8. How was case resolved (check appropriate boxes)?
Verdict
Settlement
Dismissal
Arbitration award
Other (specify):
IF THE CASE WAS SUBMITTED TO AN ADR PROCESS, PLEASE FINISH THIS FORM.
YOUR RESPONSES WILL BE CONFIDENTIAL.
9. Dispute resolution process:
Mediation
Arbitration
Neutral case evaluation
Other (specify):
10. Neutral party's name, address, and telephone number:
11. How was case resolved?
a.
As a direct result of the ADR process.
b.
As an indirect result of the ADR process.
c
Settlement was unrelated to ADR process.
12. If the case did not resolve as a result of the ADR process, what benefit, if any, did you gain by participation in the ADR
process?
13. Total fees charged to all parties by the neutral party:
14. The ADR process was scheduled within
weeks of contacting the provider.
15. The ADR process commenced on
It lasted
hours and was completed on
16. How did you select the neutral party?
ADR list
Referral
Advertising
Prior experience
Other (specify).
2000 (C) American LegalNet, Inc.
ADR Evaluation Form
17. Place a number inside the box to indicate how you feel about this dispute process in terms of the following areas:
Scales
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
1=Very satisfied 2=Satisfied 3=Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
4=Dissatisfied
5=Very dissatisfied
Permitted me to present the case in an appropriate manner.
Allowed the legal issues to be addressed in an appropriate manner.
Allowed the non-legal issues to be addressed in an appropriate manner.
Provided the opportunity to participate in structuring the outcome of the case
Provided a fair process.
Reduced the cost of the case for my client.
Overall, how do you feel about the dispute resolution process used for this case?
g.
18. Do you think this dispute resolution process fit this particular case?
Yes, the process was suitable
No, the process was unsuitable
Please explain why you came to this conclusion, being as specific as possible:
19. Would you be willing to consider using this dispute resolution process again?
Yes
No
20. Place a number inside the box to indicate how you feel about the neutral party who handled your case in this dispute resolution process in terms of the following areas:
Scales
1=Very satisfied 2 =Satisfied
3=Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
a.
Knowledge of the legal issues of your case.
c.
5=Very dissatisfied
Knowledge of the content area of your case.
b.
4=Dissatisfied
Neutrality and lack of bias.
Skill in structuring and guiding the process.
d.
21. Do you think this person fit this particular case?
No, the person was unsuitable.
Yes, the person was suitable.
Please explain why you came to this conclusion, being as specific as possible:
22. Would you be willing to use this person again?
Yes
No
23 Please provide any other comments Elating to the dispute resolution process:
2000 (C) American LegalNet, Inc.