Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Stipulation To Alternative Dispute Resolution And To Select ADR Provider (Certification And Selection) Form. This is a California form and can be use in Sacramento Local County.
Loading PDF...
Tags: Stipulation To Alternative Dispute Resolution And To Select ADR Provider (Certification And Selection), PR-E-LP-002, California Local County, Sacramento
THIS FORM MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN OR PRINTED
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Address, Telephone, SBN)
Attorney For:
Court Use Only
Fax No.:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
ESTATE OF:
IN RE:
Case no.:
Date:
Time:
Decedent
Conservatee
Minor
STIPULATION TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
AND TO SELECT ADR PROVIDER
Dept:
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS
All Parties Must Complete and Serve this Form
Formal litigation of contested matters in the Probate Court is expensive and time
consuming. The overall results achieved by litigation are often unsatisfactory, and
family and/or personal relationships can be permanently damaged. There are
alternatives to formal court litigation which are less expensive, less time consuming,
and more beneficial to the parties. It is therefore the policy and goal of this court to
encourage the parties in all contested probate matters to explore and pursue private
dispute resolution alternatives at the earliest possible date.
Although most (90-98%) cases do settle, many settlements come only after
considerable time, money, and resources have been expended and many personal
attacks have been made. Such expenditures and personal attacks, as well as the
adversarial nature of litigation, can be a hindrance or preclusion to settlement. The
Probate Court of the Sacramento County Superior Court encourages the use of
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as early as possible after the parties become
aware that a matter is contested.
Most ADR processes are voluntary and are paid for by the parties themselves, or
from the funds in dispute, if any, as the parties may agree, but ADR has proven in many
cases to be faster, cheaper, more effective and less damaging to personal relationships
than traditional litigation.
ADVANTAGES OF ADR:
The filing of a petition or objection in the Probate Court which results in a
contested matter may be just the beginning of the costs that you will incur during the
course of your matter. You may significantly reduce these costs by either resolving the
matter before expensive discovery and trial proceedings are commenced or by
narrowing the scope of your discovery by identifying disputed and undisputed factual
and legal issues.
ADR can be an effective way to resolve contested probate matters. Most litigants
report satisfaction with the process and some even report improvement of family or
personal relationships. ADR procedures can be scheduled at the convenience of the
parties and can be completed in a fraction of the time required for traditional litigation.
PR-E-LP-002
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com
The cost of ADR will depend on the procedure and the provider you select, and the cost
is typically less than litigation.
The ADR process is confidential. Many ADR processes will give you an
opportunity to test the strengths and weaknesses of your case while obtaining a better
understanding of the other party’s case without adverse impact in the event of trial.
Depending upon the method of ADR you select, it may be the last chance for you to
create and control a resolution of your matter before you place the decision in the
hands of a judge.
METHODS OF ADR:
A. MEDIATION: Mediation is a frequently used methods of ADR because it is
informal, quick, convenient and confidential. In this process the parties select a neutral
mediator who facilitates the identification of issues, areas of agreement, and assists in
finding a resolution or settlement of the dispute. Since mediation requires the
agreement of the parties to resolve the matter, control of the proceedings and a
determination of the settlement terms remains completely in the parties’ hands. The
mediator remains neutral and assists the parties in arriving at terms that are mutually
agreeable.
B. ARBITRATION: The parties jointly employ a neutral third party or a panel of
neutrals to listen to both sides and render a decision. The parties are free to make the
arbitrator’s decision binding or non-binding. When non-binding, the arbitrator’s decision
serves as guide or influence upon the parties to bring them closer to settlement. If it is
binding, the decision of the arbitrator will be final and generally avoids any further
proceedings in the case. Non-binding judicial arbitration may be ordered in certain
cases shortly before trial.
C. EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION: A neutral evaluator is hired by the parties
to give an evaluation of the case to help settle it. You and your attorney will be
permitted to prepare a written statement, present witnesses or other evidence, argue
your case to the evaluator, meet separately and confidentially with the evaluator, and
utilize the evaluator to communicate any settlement offers to the opposing party.
D. PRIVATE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: A voluntary settlement conference
is similar to early neutral evaluation in that the parties employ a neutral settlement
officer who attempts to persuade the parties to accept a compromise position. It is a
form of facilitated negotiation in which the settlement officer may express an opinion
about the value of the case, the substantive merits of each party’s position, and the
probable outcome of the trial.
E. OTHER OPTION: There are various other methods or combinations of
methods of ADR, such as mini-trial, special master discovery referee, and the Court
does not intend to limit you to any particular method or combination of methods. The
Court encourages the parties to be creative in selecting the process which has the best
chance of resolving the case as quickly, effectively, inexpensively as possible. Other
options may be reviewed by the court at the time of the mandatory settlement
conference.
PR-E-LP-002
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com
The undersigned party is willing to agree to any of the following forms of
ADR at this time:
Mediation
Early Neutral Evaluation
Non-Binding Arbitration
Binding Arbitration
Voluntary Settlement Conference
Other ___________________
None
I/We certify that I/We have read and understood (or have had explained to
me/us) the foregoing.
Date:_______________________
_______________________________
Signature of Party
Date:______________________
_______________________________
Signature of Party
Date:_______________________
______________________________
Signature of Party
Date:_______________________
______________________________
Signature of Attorney
Signature(s) of additional party(ies) and attorneys on attachment(s).
NOTE: All parties must complete, file and serve this form on all other parties and
their attorneys. Attached proof of service must be completed and filed.
PR-E-LP-002
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com