Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Confidential Evaluation By Attorney Form. This is a California form and can be use in Yolo Local County.
Loading PDF...
Tags: Confidential Evaluation By Attorney, California Local County, Yolo
Yolo County Superior Court, ADR Program
CONFIDENTIAL EVALUATION BY ATTORNEY
In accordance with ADR Program procedures, please submit evaluation by mail or fax within 10
days of completion of the ADR process.
ADR Administrator
725 Court Street, Rm. 103
Woodland, Ca. 95695
Fax: 530-406-6734
This confidential information will be used to assess the impact on the court, to track quality, and to
inform our decisions regarding redesign of program procedures. Other staff and trial judges do not
see specific evaluations. This information will be aggregated for blind statistical reports to the
Judicial Council, the Court and the Community.
Case Name: _____________________________________ Case Number: __________________
Type of Case: ____________________________________ Name of Neutral:_______________
1. I am:
Plaintiff’s Attorney
Defendant’s Attorney
Other:________________
I participated in an ADR session: Yes
No
If you answered NO above, please indicate the reason(s) why below. If you answered YES
continue to question 2:
Parties unwilling Not yet scheduled
Other, describe:______________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
2. ADR process used in case (indicate if more than one):
Private Arbitration
Early Settlement Conference
Mediation
Judicial Arbitration
Other:_________________________
3. Please indicate if the case resolved:
Fully
Partially
Did Not Resolve
4. If the case resolved, how much of a factor was an ADR process in the settlement of the case:
Not a Factor…………………………………………Very Important
1
2
3
4
5
5. Total # of sessions _____ Approx total # of hours_____ Approx # of follow up calls _____
6. How many days elapsed (estimate) from the filing of the complaint to the ADR session? ____
7. Indicate at what phase the ADR session occurred (indicate if more than one)
Within 4 months of filing
After some preliminary discovery
After significant amount of discovery
Trial was imminent
8. Which of the following court events were avoided because of the ADR session(s)?
Attorney Evaluation Form
03-07 Rev.
1
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkflow.com
Discovery Motion(s)
Summary Judgment Motion
Trial
Deposition(s)
Trial Readiness Conference
Other_____________
CMC
Mandatory Settlement Conference
9. In your opinion, using ADR in this case:
Reduced
or
Increased costs for each party
(apart from the neutral’s fees) by:
Under $5,000
$5-$10,000
$10-$25,000
$25-$50,000
$50-$100,000
$100-$250,000
$250-$500,000
Other__________
10. In your opinion, using the ADR process in this case,
Reduced court time
Increased court time
Please estimate the number of days court time was reduced/increased as a result of the parties going
to ADR. (Consider the decrease/increase in the number of court days relative to discovery, motions,
settlement conferences and trial.)
1-3 days
3-5 days
5-10 days
10-20 days 20+ days
11. Please indicate which, if any, of the following occurred during the ADR session: Please check
all that apply.
Communication between the parties was improved.
Parties came away with a better understanding of the case.
Parties clarified, resolved and eliminated some issues.
If the case did not resolve, nevertheless it proved helpful and timesaving preparing for trial.
Other Comments: ___________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest level and 5 being the highest level, please indicate your
satisfaction by rating the following statements:
12. This process was fair to all parties.
13. This process allowed all to be heard.
14. This process offered a safe secure setting.
15. I did not feel unduly pressured by the neutral to
reach an agreement.
16. The neutral skillfully structured the process.
17. The neutral understood the key issues.
18. I would use this neutral again.
19. I would use this ADR program again.
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
We welcome any other comments or suggestions you may have regarding the ADR neutral used in
this case or about the ADR program. Your evaluation is important to us.
Thank you
David M. Blicker
ADR Administrator-
Attorney Evaluation Form
03-07 Rev.
2
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkflow.com