Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Notice Of Availablility Of And Consent To Exercise Of Jurisdition By Magistrate Judge And Order Of Reference Form. This is a Colorado form and can be use in District Court Federal.
Loading PDF...
Tags: Notice Of Availablility Of And Consent To Exercise Of Jurisdition By Magistrate Judge And Order Of Reference, Colorado Federal, District Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Instructions Regarding
Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge
to Exercise Jurisdiction Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73,
and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2
Attached please find a copy of the United States District Court for the District of
Colorado Local Rules of Practice 72.2 (D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2), a Notice of Availability
of a Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction and Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction
by a United States Magistrate Judge, and a proposed Order of Reference.
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, it is the responsibility of the filing party to
serve a copy of these instructions, D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, and the attached forms on the
opposing party or parties and to file proof of such service with the court. The filing party
is the plaintiff when an action is commenced by the filing of a complaint, the defendant
when an action is commenced by the filing of a notice of removal, the third-party plaintiff
when a third-party complaint is filed, or any party that adds an additional party to the civil
action.
If ALL parties have consented to this exercise of jurisdiction please file an original
and two copies of the Notice and Consent and proposed Order of Reference. In
accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2D, the Notice and Consent must be filed no later
than ten days after the discovery cut-off. In cases not requiring discovery, the parties
shall have 40 days from the filing of the last responsive pleading to file their unanimous
consent.
If any additional parties are added after the entry of an Order of Reference to the
magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the party adding an additional party or parties
MUST file with the clerk a document titled “Notice,” which informs the clerk that an
additional party has or parties have been added. The notice MUST provide the added
party’s address, or parties’ addresses, so that the clerk can serve a copy of these
instructions, D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, and attached forms upon the newly added party or
parties in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2F. This mailing will be completed
promptly.
You are encouraged to serve the summons and complaint promptly so that the
added party or parties will understand the reason for being sent the attached forms from
the Clerk’s Office.
(06/21/02)
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
D.C.CO LO.LCivR 72.2
CONSENT JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGES
A.
Designation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and subject to the provisions of
this rule, all full-time magistrate judges in the District of Colorado are specially
designated to conduct any or all proceedings in any jury or nonjury civil matter and
order the entry of judgment in the case. This rule, implementing 28 U.S.C. §
636(c) consent jurisdiction in the District of Colorado, does not affect assignments
to magistrate judges under other court rules and orders of reference.
B.
Prohibition. No judicial officer, court official, or court employee may attempt to
influence the granting or withholding of consent to the reference of any civil
matter to a magistrate judge under this rule. The form of notice of right to consent
to disposition by a magistrate judge shall make reference to the prohibition and
shall identify the rights being waived.
C.
Notice. Upon the filing of any civil case, the clerk shall deliver to the plaintiff(s)
written notice of the right of the parties to consent to disposition of the case by a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and the provisions of this rule.
The written notice shall be in such form as the district judges shall direct. The
clerk shall also provide copies of such notice to be attached to the summons and
thereafter served upon the defendant(s) in the manner provided by Fed. R. Civ. P.
4. A failure to serve a copy of such notice upon any defendant shall not affect the
validity of the service of process or personal jurisdiction over the defendant(s).
D.
Unanimous Consent; Determination. Written consent to proceed before a
magistrate judge must be filed no later than ten days after the discovery cut-off
date. In cases not requiring discovery, the parties shall have 40 days from the
filing of the last responsive pleading to file their unanimous consent. When there
is such consent, the magistrate judge shall forthwith notify the assigned district
judge, who will then determine whether to enter an order of reference pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
E.
Reassignment. Upon entry of an order of reference pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(c), the civil action will be reassigned to a magistrate judge by random draw,
excluding the magistrate judge previously assigned.
(06/21/02)
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
F.
Additional Parties. Any party added to the action or served after reference to a
magistrate judge under this rule shall be notified by the clerk of the right to
consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(c). If any added party does not file a consent to proceed before a
magistrate judge within 20 days from the date of mailing of the notice, the action
shall be returned to the assigned district judge for further proceedings.
G.
Vacating Reference. The district judge, for good cause shown on the district
judge’s own initiative or under extraordinary circumstances shown by a party, may
vacate a reference of a civil matter to a magistrate judge under this rule.
H.
Appeal. Upon entry of a judgment in any civil action on consent of the parties
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) authority, an appeal shall be directly to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any
other judgment of this court.
(06/21/02)
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. __________________________
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Defendant(s).
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, you are
hereby notified that a United States magistrate judge of this district court is available to handle all dispositive matters in this
civil action, including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a
magistrate judge, however, is permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent and the district judge orders the reference to a
magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court's
jurisdiction from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or
withholding consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been
assigned.
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, no district judge or magistrate judge, court official, or court employee may
attempt to influence the granting or withholding of consent to the reference of any civil matter to a magistrate judge under this
rule.
An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the appropriate United States Court
of Appeals in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
If this civil action has been referred to a magistrate judge to handle certain nondispositive matters, that reference shall
remain in effect. Upon entry of an order of reference pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the civil action will be drawn randomly to
a magistrate judge, excluding the magistrate judge previously assigned.
CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, the parties in
this civil action hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in
the case, including the trial, and order the entry of a final judgment.
Signatures
Party Represented
Date
Print
Print
Print
Print
NOTE: Return the original and a co py of this form to the clerk of the co urt ONL Y IF all parties have consented ON TH IS FO RM to
the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States magistrate judge. Also attach a captioned prop osed order. (See attached).
(06/21/02)
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. __________________________
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Defendant(s).
ORDER OF REFERENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c)
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2 on the _______ day of __________________, _______, Magistrate Judge
____________________ notified the court of the parties' unanimous consent to disposition of the above action by a
United States Magistrate Judge. Now, therefore, being sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1.
The above action is referred for disposition to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c);
2.
The above action will be randomly assigned to a magistrate judge selected by random draw, excluding
Magistrate Judge ____________________; and
3.
Upon such reassignment, the above case number will be amended to reflect the magistrate judge to whom
the case is reassigned.
BY THE COURT:
DATED: ______________________
___________________________________
Judge, United States District Court
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT
Pursuant to the above order, this civil action is reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge
____________________.
Gregory C. Langham, Clerk
By _______________________,Deputy Clerk
(06/21/02)
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com