REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM DOCKET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (DMP) DISMISSAL STATE OF CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT www.jud.ct.gov JD-CL-71 Rev. 9-06 Pr. Bk. § 14-3 CASE CAPTION DOCKET NO. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DATE SENT DMP Calendar Letter Seq. # REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM DOCKET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (DMP) DISMISSAL The PLAINTIFF(S) DEFENDANT(S) in the above-captioned action seek(s) exemption from Docket Management Program dismissal and in support thereof represent(s) that the pleadings are not closed because: ("X" applicable box(es) and fill in appropriate information.) A dispositive motion to strike has been argued and is awaiting decision by Judge . (Name) A dispositive motion to dismiss has been argued and is awaiting decision by Judge . (Name) A dispositive motion for summary judgment has been argued and is awaiting decision by Judge . (Name) The pleadings are closed as to the plaintiff's original complaint, and it is failure to close the pleadings as to a third party that is preventing the filing of a Certificate of Closed Pleadings (JD-CV-11). complaint filed by (Name) A defendant has filed a counterclaim within the past 30 days, and the plaintiff(s) has/have not had time to file an answer or dispositive motion. A bankruptcy proceeding is pending and an up-to-date affidavit as prescribed in P.B. § 14-2 is attached. This is a receivership case filed under Chapter 664c of the Connecticut General Statutes and there has been compliance with C.G.S. Section 36a-231. This is a Lead Paint Litigation (LPL) case. By checking this box, counsel represents that (s)he has filed the face sheet and provided notice of the filing as noted in LPL Case Management Order No. 1, Section lll. This is a Complex Litigation Docket (CLD) case. By checking this box, counsel represents that an application for referral to the CLD has been filed by counsel or by the Presiding Judge and that it has been granted or is awaiting a decision. This case contains an order for relief from abuse that is still active. Other This is the FIRST SECOND THIRD Program dismissal has been requested in this case. time an exemption from Docket Management Note: A claim that the case has been effectively settled but that it can not be withdrawn because additional settlement payments need to be made is NOT a basis for exemption from Docket Management Program dismissal. The parties in such cases are urged to reach unambiguous settlement agreements, which may be put on record, if desired, and which may be enforced as judgments if one party defaults after the withdrawal is filed. See Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay and Stubbs, Inc., 225 Conn. 804, 626 A.2d 729 (1993). PARTY NAME(S) REQUESTING EXEMPTION SIGNED (Attorney or Pro Se Party) NAME AND ADDRESS OF ATTORNEY/PRO SE PARTY (Type or print legibly) DATE CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy hereof was mailed/delivered to all counsel and pro se parties of record on: NAME OF EACH PARTY SERVED* ADDRESS AT WHICH SERVICE WAS MADE *If necessary, attach additional sheet with names of each party served and the address at which service was made. SIGNED TELEPHONE NO. (with area code) X ORDER (For Court Use Only) REQUEST GRANTED REQUEST DENIED (GR) BY THE COURT (Judge/Clerk) DATE SIGNED (DN) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com