421. Negligence per se: Rebuttal of the Presumption of Negligence (Violation of Minor Excused) Instruction No 1 Request by Plaintiff Request by Defendant Requested by Given as Proposed Given as Modified Given on Court?s Motion Refused Withdrawn Judge Instruction No 1 [Name of plaintiff/defendant] claims that even if [he/she] violated the law, [he/she] is not negligent because [he/she] was years old at the time of the incident. If you find that [name of plaintiff/defendant] was as careful as a reasonably careful child of the same age, intelligence, knowledge and experience would have been in the same situation, then [name of plaintiff/defendant] was not negligent. New September 2003