Approved, SCAO � PCS CODE: PTRTCS CODE: PTRV/OFPTSTATE OF MICHIGANJUDICIAL CIRCUIT - FAMILY DIVISIONCOUNTY ORDER AFTER POSTTERMINATION REVIEW/PERMANENCY PLANNING HEARING(CHILD PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS)ORDER en-US en-US OF en-US en-USCASE NO.en-USPETITION NO.en-USCourt addressen-USCourt telephone no. 1. � In the matter of � en-USname(s), alias(es), DOB 2. � Date of hearing: en-US � Judge/Referee: en-USBar no. 3. � Last permanency planning hearing date: en-US en-US en-US(Specify for each child if different.) 4. � Parental rights to the child(ren) named above were previously terminated. 5. � Notice of hearing for the � review � permanency planning � combined review and permanency planning � � hearing was served as required by law. � 6. � The court has considered the permanency plan and other evidence presented. The findings below are specific to this case � � and are based upon this hearing, and � en-US the following report(s): en-USIdentify report(s) and date(s) of report(s)en-USTHE COURT FINDS: 7. � A � review � permanency planning � combined review and permanency planning hearing � was conducted. � 8. � The lawyer-guardian ad litem � has � has not � complied with the requirements of MCL 712A.17d. 9. � Reasonable efforts � have � have not � been made to finalize the court-approved permanency plan of � � a. � adoption for the child(ren) named en-US en-US . � � b. � legal guardianship for the child(ren) named en-US en-US . � � c. � placement with a fit and willing relative for the child(ren) named en-US en-US . � � d. � placement in another planned permanent living arrangement (APPLA) for the child(ren) age 16 or older named � en-US en-US , � due to the compelling reasons that: en-US(Specify the compelling reasons for another planned permanent living arrangement by entering the � language that corresponds to the number[s] from the list on the last page.) � � The reasonable efforts made to finalize the court-approved permanency plan identified above include: � en-US(Specify the permanency plan for each child and the reasonable efforts made toward finalizing that plan.) � American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Order After Posttermination Review/Permanency Planning Hearing � (12/18) � Page of Order of Case No. Petition No. 10. � The permanency planning goal in item 9 � is appropriate. � en-US is no longer appropriate and shall be: � � en-US en-US . 11. � Progress toward the child(ren)222s adoption or other permanent placement � was � was not � made in a timely manner. 12. � The child(ren)222s continued placement � en-US is necessary and appropriate and is meeting the child(ren)222s needs. � en-US is no longer necessary or appropriate. � 13. � � a. � All siblings are in joint placement. � � b. � All siblings are not in joint placement because: � Sibling contact � is occurring according to law. � en-US is not occurring because en-US(see item 17 to order sibling contact)en-US: � 14. � The appointment of a juvenile guardian is in the best interest of the child(ren) named above in item 9.b. � en-US The court � � has received and considered the information required by MCR 3.979(A)(1) and (3) and the proposed guardian should be � � appointed. � 15. � A juvenile guardian was appointed and jurisdiction over en-US en-US � � under MCL 712A.2(b) should be terminated. en-US(This finding is considered at the first review hearing after the appointment.) � 16. � A juvenile guardianship for en-US � � was revoked pursuant to MCR 3.979(F), and this hearing is held under MCR 3.979(F)(7). � en-US The child(ren) was/were � � committed to the department for permanency planning, supervision, care, and placement under MCL 400.203. en-USIT IS ORDERED:en-US � 17. � Sibling contact shall be as follows: � � 18. � The child(ren)222s commitment under � en-US MCL 400.203 en-US(MCI ward) � en-US MCL 710.29 en-US(adoption code) � continues. � 19. � The department shall, for the child(ren) named in item 9.b, � a. � conduct a criminal record check and central registry clearance of the residents of the home of the proposed juvenile � guardian and submit the results to the court within 7 days. � b. � perform a home study with a copy submitted to the court within 28 days, unless a home study has been performed � within the immediately preceding 365 days of this order, in which case, a copy of that study shall be submitted to the � court. � c. � seek the written consent for the appointment of the proposed juvenile guardian from the superintendent of the Michigan � Children222s Institute, to be filed with the court within 28 days. � 20. � The child(ren) shall be placed under juvenile guardianship pursuant to MCR 3.979(B). en-US(See separate order, form JC 91.) � 21. � The department shall make reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan for each child. � 22. � The child(ren) has/have been adopted and the jurisdiction of this court is terminated. � 23. � The jurisdiction of this court is terminated because of the child(ren)222s age(s). � 24. � The jurisdiction of this court is terminated pursuant to MCL 712A.19c(9) and MCR 3.979(C). American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Order After Posttermination Review/Permanency Planning Hearing � (12/18) � Page of Order of Case No. Petition No. en-USIT IS ORDERED:en-US (continued)en-US � 25. � Other: � 26. � Review hearings shall be held as follows: en-US(en-USNote:en-US The review hearing shall not be delayed beyond the number of days required regardless � en-USwhether another matter is pending. MCL 712A.19a provides that the permanency planning hearing shall not be delayed beyond 12 months from the � date of removal of the child and every 12 months thereafter.) � en-US posttermination review hearing en-US � en-US permanency planning hearing en-US � en-US dispositional review hearing to terminate jurisdiction pursuant to MCR 3.979(C) en-US � The supervising agency shall provide documentation of progress relating to all aspects of the last court-ordered treatment � plan, including copies of evaluations and therapy reports and verification of parenting time not later than 5 business days � before the scheduled hearing. � � 27. � A hearing to appoint the juvenile guardian under MCR 3.979(B) shall be held en-USNo later than 35 daysen-US . 28. � � Notice of the next hearing has been provided as required by law. � en-US Notice of the next hearing shall be provided.en-USRecommended by: Referee signature � Date en-USDate � en-USJudgeen-US en-USThe following are examples of compelling reasons for a permanency plan other than legal guardianship, placement en-USwith a fit and willing relative, or adoption. 1. � No relative has been identified who is appropriate or available to assume the permanent custody of the child. 2. � The current caregiver is not an adoptive resource. 3. � Reasonable efforts to recruit an adoptive home have been unsuccessful. 4. � The child does not want to be adopted and is of an age where due consideration must be given to his/her wishes. 5. � It is contrary to the child222s best interests to break the child222s attachment to the current caregivers. 6. � The current caregiver is committed to providing a permanent placement for the child. 7. � The placement allows the siblings to remain together. 8. � The child222s special needs can best be met in this placement. 9. � The child wants to remain in the current placement, which is only available as foster care. 10. � The placement is preparing the child for transition into independent living (specify the services being provided to the child to � assist with transition such as referral to an independent living skills program, enrollment in a vocational program, referral for a mentor � continued out-of-home placement in foster care beyond age 18 to allow the child to complete secondary school, placement in a resource � that provides on-site training for independent living, and other similar services). 11. � The child comes under the Indian Child Welfare Act and Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act, and the child222s tribe recommends � � permanent placement in long-term foster care. 12. � Other (specify in the findings in item 9.d). American LegalNet, Inc. www.Forms