Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Order Of Disposition (Child Protective Proceedings) Form. This is a Michigan form and can be use in Juvenile Statewide.
Tags: Order Of Disposition (Child Protective Proceedings), JC 17, Michigan Statewide, Juvenile
Approved, SCAO � PCS CODE: DSPTCS CODE: DSPSTATE OF MICHIGANJUDICIAL CIRCUIT - FAMILY DIVISIONCOUNTY ORDER OF DISPOSITION(CHILD PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS)ORDER en-US OF en-US en-USCASE NO.en-USPETITION NO.en-USCourt addressen-USCourt telephone no. 1. � In the matter of � en-USname(s), alias(es), DOB 2. � Date of hearing: en-US � Judge/Referee: en-USBar no. � 3. � Removal date: en-US en-US en-US(Specify for each child if different.) 4. � An adjudication was held and the child(ren) was/were found to come within the jurisdiction of the court. � � 5. � Release of the parental rights to en-USName(s) of child(ren)en-US was executed by � en-USName(s) of parent(s)en-US pursuant to the adoption code on en-USDateen-US . � 6. � This hearing is being conducted under MCR 3.974(D)(1) for an Indian child who was removed from the home. The Indian child � removal hearing � was held with this hearing. � was previously held. � en-US is scheduled for en-US . � en-USTHE COURT FINDS: � 7. � Notice of hearing was given as required by law. 8. � The lawyer-guardian ad litem � has � has not � complied with the requirements of MCL 712A.17d. � 9. � � a. � There is probable cause to believe the legal/putative father(s) is/are: � (Name each child, his/her father, and whether legal or putative.) � � b. � The putative father of en-US en-US is unknown and cannot be identified. � � c. � The putative father was notified as required by law and failed to establish paternity within the time set by the court. � The putative father waives all rights to further notice, including the right to notice of termination of parental rights and � the right to an attorney. 10. � The court has considered the case service plan and other evidence presented. The findings below are specific to this case � and are based upon this hearing and � � the following report(s): en-USIdentify report(s) and date(s) of report(s) � Specific conditions reviewed on the record as required by MCL 712A.18f(4) were � a. � compliance with the case service plan with respect to services provided or offered to the child and his or her parent(s), � guardian, or legal custodian and whether the parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian complied with and benefited from � those services. � b. � compliance with the case service plan with respect to parenting time with the child and whether parenting time did not � occur or was infrequent and the reasons why. � c. � the extent to which the parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian complied with each provision of the case service plan, � prior court orders, and any agreement between the parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian and the agency. � d. � likely harm to the child if the child continued to be separated from his or her parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian. � e. � likely harm to the child if the child was returned to his or her parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian. en-USNote:en-US If it comes to the court222s attention or new allegations are made during this hearing that require the removal of the child(ren), removal must be done in en-USaccordance with MCR 3.974. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Order of Disposition (Child Protective Proceedings) � (12/18) � Page of Order of Case No. Petition No. 11. � Return of the juvenile to his or her parent � would � would not � cause a substantial risk of harm to the juvenile or � society. � 12. � � a. � Consistent with the circumstances, reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal of the child(ren) from the � � � home were made as determined in a prior order. � en-USOR � � b. � Consistent with the circumstances, reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate removal of the child(ren) � � from the home. Those efforts include: (Specify below.) � � en-USOR � � c. � The child(ren) is/are Indian, and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence and the testimony of a qualified � � expert witness who has knowledge about the child-rearing practices of the Indian child222s tribe, that active efforts � � have � have not � been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent � � the breakup of the Indian family. These efforts have proved � unsuccessful, � successful, � the continued � � custody of the child(ren) by the parent or Indian custodian � is � is not � likely to result in serious emotional or � physical damage to the child(ren), and the child(ren) � should � should not � be removed from the home. � � en-US(Specify below.) � The efforts for 12b or 12c are: (Specify the efforts from 12b or 12c here. If the child is an Indian child, specify active efforts as defined � � en-USby MCR 3.002[1] and MCL 712B.3[a].) � � d. � Reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal of the child(ren) from the home were not made. � � e. � Reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal were not required as determined in a prior order. � � 13. � a. � Reasonable efforts are not required to prevent or eliminate the child(ren)222s removal from the home due to the � � mother � father � subjecting the child(ren) to the aggravated circumstance(s) of � en-US en-US as provided in section MCL 722.638(1) and (2), and as evidenced � by � en-US en-US � en-US � en-US en-US . � � mother222s � father222s � conviction for murder of another child of the parent. � � mother222s � father222s � conviction for voluntary manslaughter of another child of the parent. � � mother222s � father222s � conviction for aiding or abetting in the murder or manslaughter of another � � child of the parent, attempting to murder the child(ren) or another child of the parent, or conspiring or soliciting to � � commit the murder of the child(ren) or another child of the parent. � � mother222s � father222s � conviction for felony assault that resulted in serious bodily injury to the � � child(ren) or another child of the parent. � � mother222s � father222s � involuntary termination of parental rights to a sibling of the child(ren) and � failure by that parent to rectify the conditions that led to that termination. � � mother � father � being required to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act. � b. � Reasonable efforts to preserve and reunify the family to make it possible for the child(ren) to safely return home are � � not required because the parent subjected the child or another child of the parent to one of the circumstances � � stated above. � � en-USOR � � still recommended because: � � (When item 13 is checked, either complete item 15 below or schedule a permanency planning hearing within 28 days of this determination.) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Order of Disposition (Child Protective Proceedings) � (12/18) � Page of Order of Case No. Petition No. � 14. � � a. � Reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify the family to make it possible for the child(ren) to safely � � return home. � � � b. � Reasonable efforts shall not be made to preserve and reunify the family because it would be detrimental to the � � child(ren)222s health and safety. � � � c. � Reasonable efforts to preserve and reunify the family were not previously required, but due to a change in � � circumstances, reasonable efforts are now required. Those reasonable efforts have begun and include: en-US(Specify � � reasonable efforts, and if applicable, the reasons for return.) � � � � The child(ren) should be released to en-USName(s) of parent(s), guardian, or legal custodianen-US . � 15. � Because reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal or to reunite the child(ren) and family are not required, a � permanency planning hearing was conducted. en-US(en-USUse and attach form JC 19en-US, Order Following Dispositional Review/Permanency Planning � � Hearing.) 16. � Custody of the child(ren) with the parent/guardian/legal custodian � � a. � presents a substantial risk of harm to the child(ren)222s life, physical health, or mental well-being. � � No provision of service or other arrangement except removal of the child(ren) is reasonably available to adequately � � safeguard the child(ren) from the risk of harm to the child(ren)222s life, physical health, or mental well-being. � � Conditions of custody at the p