Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Manufacturer’s Personnel Position Contact Information Note 1: Bolded references indicate procedures/documents that must be performed/prepared by the system. With regard to the unbolded references, if the procedures/documents are performed/prepared by the system, the system will not be approved until those features either function in compliance with Nevada’s regulatory scheme, are securely disabled in the system or are removed from the system. Underlined references indicate reports, records or source documents. The exact title for reports, records or source documents should be included in the comments column, where applicable. Note 2: “OSMS” refers to an On-line Slot Metering System. “CWS” refers to a Cashless Wagering System. “System” refers to both an OSMS and a CWS. Pass Fail N/A Comments General Controls 1. Is the computer system, including application software, secured through the use of passwords or biometrics? Note: Other means may be approved by the Board upon submission. IT MICS #3 2. Has the manufacturer supplied system documentation, including description of both hardware and software (including version numbers), operator manuals, etc? IT MICS #6 3. Are user identification numbers/names and passwords controlled as follows unless otherwise addressed in this checklist: (a) When multiple identification numbers/names per application are used, is only one number active at a time and does the user name have a unique prefix/suffix to easily identify the users with multiple operator numbers? IT MICS #7a (b) On a quarterly basis, does the system prompt users to change passwords and then denies access if the change is not completed? Alternatively, are changes to passwords documented by the system? IT MICS #7d (c) Are passwords required to be at least four characters long? 4. Are personnel access listings created which include at a minimum: (a) Employee name and title or position? (b) Employee identification? (c) Listing of functions the employee can perform or equivalent means of identifying same? IT MICS # 9 5. If the system can be remotely accessed, do the controls allow only authorized vendor personnel access to the system? IT MICS #15c Document in the comments column what information the system records when it is remotely accessed. IT MICS #16 6. Do the created reports include on all pages: (a) Document title? (b) Row/columnar headings? 02/17/06 Page 1 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass (c) (d) (e) (f) Fail N/A Comments Page number? Version number of the current system software? The date or time period of the activity? The date and time the document was generated? 7. If the system backs-up daily data files, does the backup feature function? IT MICS #5a 8. Is in-house developed or purchased software programs backed-up? Backup of purchased software is not required if software can be reinstalled by the vendor. IT MICS #5b 9. Does the system directly store documents to unalterable media? (a) Does the storage medium contain an exact duplicate of the original document? IT MICS #17a (b) Are all documents stored maintained with a detailed index containing the department and date? Regulation 6.040(1) & IT MICS #17b 10. Is system exception information created (e.g. changes to system parameters, corrections, overrides, voids, etc.)? IT MICS #8 Also, see other references to “exception information” in this checklist. 11. Are IT personnel denied access to live data files? IT MICS #11c 12. If the system is capable of generating security logs (e.g. multiple attempts to log on, denial of access to users after three tries, changes to live data file, etc.), are the logs accessible to IT supervisors for review? IT MICS #13 Describe items that the log lists. 13. If the system accepts “other instrumentalities” are they in compliance with the chairman’s letter approving the use of “other instrumentalities” in that the instrumentalities contain the name of the casino, city and state, dollar amount of the instrument (both alpha and numeric), date, time, sequence number, validation number, bar code, and expiration period or date when instrumentality will expire? Regulation 12.100 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE (The following steps, where applicable, should be verified/tested through the system) 14. 02/17/06 If the system will be used in an international gaming salon: (a) Does the system communicate with the gaming devices in the salon in the same manner as devices in other parts of the casino? If the chairman has imposed other requirements, is the system in compliance? Describe other requirements in Comments column. Regulation 5.200(4)(a) (b) Does the system create transaction reports detailing all wagers made and the resulting payouts for each patron during each gaming session? Regulation 5.200(4)(b) (c) If the machines are capable of accepting other instrumentalities approved by the board, are the instrumentalities validated by the cashless wagering system? Regulation 5.200(4)(d) Page 2 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass 15. Fail N/A Comments Can a salon gaming slot report (independent from the report required in Slots MICS #110) be produced at least monthly that shows month-to-date, year-to-date, and if practicable, life-to-date actual hold percentage computations for individual machines in the salon gaming area and a comparison to each machine’s theoretical hold percentage? Note: “Life-to-Date” represents at least a previous two-year cumulative basis. Slots MICS #88 16. Is the slot machine performance data related to the international gaming salon reflected in both the slot analysis reports for the casino as a whole and in a separate salon gaming slot report? Slots MICS #88 17. If the system records, increments and pays out in-house progressive jackpots: (a) Is a log created which records the base amount and the amount of the jackpot at least once a day? (b) Are changes to the rate of progression noted in the system records? (c) If there is a limit the progressive amount does the system impose the limit correctly? (d) Does the system record reductions/corrections to the progressive amount? Regulation 5.110(2) & (3) 18. If the slot system has an inter-casino linked system component, does it: (a) In the case of a progressive payoff schedule that increases as the inter-casino linked system is played, have a minimum rate of progression for the primary jackpot meter of not less than .4 of one percent of amounts wagered? (b) In the case of an inter-casino linked system featuring a progressive payoff schedule that increases over time, have a minimum rate of progression for the primary jackpot meter of not less than one hundred dollars per day? (c) Allow an operator to limit a progressive payoff schedule as allowed by Regulation 5.112(5)? (d) Have a method to secure data transmissions between the games and devices and the main computer of the operator, as approved by the board? (e) If the inter-casino linked system links gaming devices of differing denominations, are the odds of winning the payoff schedule in proportion to the amount wagered or is the same wager required to win the payoff schedule regardless of the device’s denomination? Regulation 14.045(1), (2) & (3)(b) 19. If the linked system records, increments and pays out intercasino progressive jackpots: (a) Is a log created which records the base amount and the amount of the jackpot at least once a day? (b) Are changes to the rate of progression noted in the system records? Regulation 5.112(3) & (4) 20. Does the system create the following regarding an intercasino linked system: (a) Progressive payoff schedule payout verification documents? (b) Exception reports? 02/17/06 Page 3 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments (c) End-of-day reports? (d) Progressive payoff schedule reports? (e) Machine performance reports? (f) Weekly reconciliation reports? (g) Contribution to progressive payoff schedule reports? Regulation 5.180(2)(h) 21. Do all communications that initiate a gaming device pay command employ a form of encryption that has been approved by the Chairman? TS 3.010(1) 22. Do all data communications incorporate an error detection and correction scheme to ensure the data is transmitted and received accurately that has been approved by the Chairman? TS 3.010(2) 23. Is the system capable of detecting, displaying and recording on an error log certain error conditions? (a) Can the error conditions be: (1) Displayed or printed on demand? (2) Archived for a minimum of thirty days? (b) Do the types of error conditions include: (1) Power reset or failure of a gaming device or any component of the system? (2) Communication loss between a gaming device and any component of the slot system? TS 3.020 24. Does the system restrict or limit access to any and all program components by a method approved by the Chairman? TS 3.030 25. Does the system: (a) Not allow the alteration of any accounting or event log information that was properly communicated from the gaming device to the system; or (b) If such alteration is allowed, are documented, secure access controls provided? TS 3.040 26. Does the system maintain an internal clock that accurately reflects the current time (in hours, minutes and seconds) and date that shall be used to provide for the following: (a) Time stamping of significant events? (b) Reference clock for reporting? (c) Time stamping of configuration changes? TS 3.050(1) 27. If multiple clocks are used, is a means provided that will update all clocks in devices attached to the system, including gaming devices, at least once in each 24-hour period? TS 3.050(2) 28. Is the system designed so that no single failure of any system component will cause the cessation of system operations? Note: If not, what are the back-up components and or systems that have been approved by the Board Chairman to compensate for any system failure. TS 3.060(1) 29. Is the database stored on redundant media so that no single failure of any portion of the system would cause the loss or corruption of data? TS 3.060(2) 02/17/06 Page 4 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass 30. Does the interface component have a mechanism whereby an error will not cause the loss of stored accounting meter information? TS 3.080 33. Does the interface component allow for the configuration of a unique identification number to be used in conjunction with the gaming device file in the system (Note: This identification number will be used by the system to track all mandatory information of the associated gaming device.)? TS 3.100 34. Is the system designed such that communications that access gaming device components, including but not limited to, bill validators, hoppers and printers, access those components only through a processor that has been approved using the standards and criteria for a gaming device? TS 3.070(3) 35. Is data recorded by electronic meters preserved after a power loss to an interface component and maintained for a period of at least 72 hours? TS 3.090 36. Is the OSMS equipped to read specific values of, or store the information accumulated by the electronic digital storage meters in the gaming device? TS 3.110 & Slots MICS #106 37. Comments Does the interface component send information to the system via a communication protocol approved by the Chairman? TS 3.070(2) 32. N/A If the system uses an interface component, does/will each gaming device interfaced with the system: (a) Have the interface component either installed inside a secure area of the gaming device; or (b) Employ a secure communication method between the gaming device and the interface component? TS 3.070(1) 31. Fail Does the OSMS store the following meter information in units equal to the denomination of the device or in dollars and cents: (a) Coin in? (b) Coin out? (c) Coin drop? (d) Attendant paid jackpots? (e) Attendant paid cancelled credits? (f) Physical coin in? (g) Physical coin out? (h) Bill in? (i) Voucher out? (j) Machine paid external bonus payout? (k) Attendant paid external bonus payout? (l) Attendant paid progressive payout? (m) Machine paid progressive payout? Note: OSMS meters must be referred to with the above terms and accumulate applicable system generated information as well as information stored on gaming device meters as required by Technical Standard 2.040. TS 3.110(1) – (13) 02/17/06 Page 5 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass 38. 39. If the time between readings is extended beyond one week in order for a reading to coincide with the end of an accounting period does the OSMS limit the extension to six days? Slots MICS #104 “Note 1” 42. If a licensee chooses to perform a slot coin or currency acceptor drop only once per month, does the system record the coin-in electronic (soft) meter readings least weekly? Slots MICS #104 “Note 2” 43. For slot machines that are not dropped and counted, does the system read and record the following meters, as applicable, at the end of the licensee’s specified 24-hour accounting period: (a) “Attendant Paid Meters” (jackpots, cancelled credits, external bonus payout, and progressive payout)? (b) Physical coin-in? (c) Physical coin out? (d) “Drop Meters” (coin drop, bill-in, voucher in and coupon promotion in)? (e) “Electronic Promotion Meters” (cashable in, cashable out, non-cashable in and non-cashable out)? (f) “Machine Paid Meters” (external bonus payout and progressive payout)? Slots MICS #126 44. Does the system prepare an unreasonable meter readings report? Slots MICS #128 45. Does the system allow for changes to meter reading reports? Slots MICS #129 46. Comments Does the OSMS have a mechanism in place to record all required meters (#37, above) on demand and at the time a drop box (coin or currency) is removed? TS 3.120 , Slots MICS #104 “Note 4” & #124 41. N/A Does the OSMS maintain paytable coin-in and weighted average theoretical payback percentage information provided by each gaming device which is considered a slot machine and which contains paytables with a difference in theoretical payback percentage which exceeds 4 percent between wager categories? TS 3.110 Note 3 40. Fail Does the OSMS maintain pay table coin-in and theoretical payback percentage information provided by the gaming device for each multi-game or multi-denomination/multigame slot machine? TS 3.110 Note 2 For payout receipts, does the OSMS: (a) Include on all payout receipts: (1) Licensee name, city and state? (2) Gaming device number? (3) Date and time of issuance? (4) Alpha and numeric dollar amount? (5) Sequence number? (6) Expiration period or date when receipt will expire? TS 3.130(1) (b) Only allow the printing of a payout receipt upon a communication initiated by a gaming device? (c) Provide for on-line, real-time validation of payout receipts? 02/17/06 Page 6 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments (d) Be incapable of authorizing payment on a payout receipt that has been previously paid, voided, or that has not been issued? (e) For payout receipts printed at a gaming device, not allow an expiration period of less than thirty days? TS 3.130(2), (3), (4) & (5) 47. Does the CWS prevent the direct wagering at a gaming device or an electronic funds transfer to a gaming device through the use of a credit card? TS 3.150(1) 48. In the event of debit instrument transactions, does the CWS execute such transactions in accordance with all applicable state and federal electronic funds transfer requirements or wagering account transfer requirements including receipting and fee disclosure requirements? TS 3.150(2) 49. Does the CWS provide for a configurable daily transfer limit not to exceed $1,000 per day per debit instrument, for electronic funds transfers? TS 3.150(2) 50. Does the CWS employ a form of data encryption that has been approved by the chairman for all data that is transmitted to or from a gaming device (Note: This standard does not apply to data that is transmitted between a gaming device and a gaming device interface component.)? TS 3.150(3) 51. Does the CWS provide a secure method for patron access to wagering accounts and promotional accounts? TS 3.150(4) and Slots MICS #153 52. Does the CWS assign a unique transaction identifier of at least eight digits that includes the gaming device designation to all patron-initiated transactions? TS 3.150(5) 53. Does the CWS read and store the specific values indicated on the electronic digital storage meters in the gaming device, as applicable to the system? TS 3.150(6) 54. Does the CWS store the following gaming device meter information in units equal to the denomination of the device, or in dollars and cents (indicate method): (a) Voucher in? (b) Voucher out (for the metering of slot machine wagering vouchers and payout receipts)? (c) Electronic funds transfer in (EFT In)? (d) Wagering account transfer in (WAT In)? (e) Wagering account transfer out (WAT Out)? (f) Cashable electronic promotion in? (g) Cashable electronic promotion out? (h) Non-cashable electronic promotion in? (i) Non-cashable electronic promotion out? (j) Coupon promotion in? (k) Coupon promotion out? Note: CWS meters must be referred to with the above terms and accumulate applicable system generated information as well as information stored on gaming device meters as required by Technical Standard 2.040. TS 3.150(6) 02/17/06 Page 7 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass 55. 56. Does the CWS cause a relevant, informative message to be displayed whenever any player-initiated wagering account transfer or electronic funds transfer is being processed? TS 3.150(10) 59. In the event communications between the CWS and a gaming device are lost, does the system allow no more than one wagering instrument to be printed? TS 3.150(11) 60. Are all electronic funds transfers recorded by the CWS? TS 3.150(12) 61. Does the CWS provide for on-line, real-time validation of wagering instruments or debit instruments? TS 3.150(13) 62. Is the CWS incapable of authorizing payment on a wagering instrument that has been previously paid, voided, or that has not been issued? TS 3.150(14) 63. Can the CWS display the status of any instrument? TS 3.150(14) 64. Does the CWS prevent the removal or erasure of events and transactions from any communication device until that information has been successfully transferred and acknowledged by the communication device next in succession? TS 3.150(15) 65. Is the CWS designed to prevent unauthorized changes to system programs and databases? TS 3.150(16) 66. Comments Does the CWS include on all slot machine wagering vouchers and coupons: (a) Licensee name, city and state? (b) Gaming device number or printer station number, as applicable? (c) Date and time of issuance? (d) Alpha and numeric dollar amount? (e) Sequence number? (f) Validation number? (g) Second printing of validation number on the leading edge of the voucher or coupon? (h) Unique identifier (e.g., bar code)? (i) Transaction type or other acceptable method of differentiating ticket types? (j) Expiration period or date when voucher or coupon will expire, if applicable? TS 3.150(9) 58. N/A Does the CWS prevent an expiration period of less than thirty days for slot machine wagering vouchers? TS 3.150(8) 57. Fail Does the CWS have a mechanism in place to record all required meters, as required by the previous question and as applicable to the system, at the time a drop box (coin or currency) is removed and at any time specified by the end user? TS 3.150(7) , Slots MICS #124 & #125 Does the CWS require the end user to initiate any remote access and only allow remote access by the system’s 02/17/06 Page 8 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments licensed manufacturer from that manufacturer’s place of business (explain)? TS 3.150(17) 67. Is the documentation generated by the OSMS available on a day, month, year-to-date basis and for at least a previous “two-year cumulative” basis? TS 3.140 68. Is the OSMS designed so that documentation may be created daily and on demand? TS 3.140 69. Does the OSMS include the following information for each document: (a) Document title? (b) Version number of the current system software? (c) Date or time period of activity? (d) Date and time the document was generated? TS 3.140(1) 70. Do all OSMS documents that compare metered amounts to actual amounts include a dollar variance and a percentage variance? TS 3.140(1) Note 71. Does the slot machine performance report created by the system include: (a) By machine: (1) Denomination or an indication that the machine is a multi-denomination machine? (2) Slot machine number and game type? (3) Coin in? (4) Metered or actual drop (system configurable)? (5) Actual jackpot payout slips issued? (6) Actual fill slips issued? (7) Win? (8) Theoretical hold percentage; (9) Actual hold percentage? (10) Percentage variance (theoretical hold vs. actual hold)? (11) Projected dollar variance (i.e., coin in times the percentage variance)? (b) By denomination and in total: (1) Weighted average theoretical hold (i.e., floor par)? (2) Combined actual hold percentage (all win divided by all coin in)? (3) Percentage variance (floor par vs. combined actual hold percentage)? (4) Projected dollar variance (i.e., total coin in times the percentage variance)? (c) Does the system compute accurate theoretical hold percentages, based on coin-in contribution, for each multi-game or multi-denomination/multi-game slot machine? (d) Does the system compute accurate theoretical hold percentages for each gaming device which is considered a slot machine and which contains paytables with a difference in theoretical payback percentage which exceeds 4 percent between wager categories? Regulation 6.040(2)(d), TS 3.140(2), TS 3.160(24) Slots MICS #110 & #115 Note: The slot analysis report for cashless wagering systems must include the wagering activity recorded 02/17/06 Page 9 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments by the meters set forth in Technical Standard 3.110. 72. If the system maintains information for those machines that have had their theoretical hold changed, does the information include the date, type of change and the recalculation? Slots MICS #98 73. Do the actual and theoretical hold percentages used in the slot analysis report created by the system represent theoretical performance of the slot machine’s paytable and excludes promotional payouts and bonus payouts not included in the slot machine’s paytable? Slots MICS #112 & #114 74. For purposes of analyzing large variances between actual hold and theoretical hold percentages, is information to create floor par reports by similar machine type maintained by the system? Note 1: Type is defined as the manufacturer’s program number. Note 2: This standard does not apply to slot machines that have multiple paytables with different theoretical hold percentages (i.e., multi-game and multi-game/multidenominational machines). Slots MICS #118 75. Does the system generate documentation of changes to slot machine computer data files? Slots MICS #119 Note: “Slot machine computer data files” include the theoretical hold percentage, coin-in amount, drop amounts, payout amounts, fill amount and win amount for each slot machine. 76. Can the system be connected and communicate with slot machines in obtaining slot machine meter information as follows: (a) For all slot machines equipped with meters described by the Regulation 14 Technical Standards, approved on or after 2/1/04, all meter information, as applicable to the licensee’s operation, is transmitted to the system, unless this requirement is waived by the chairman pursuant to Regulation 6.045? (b) For slot machines approved before 2/1/04 that are equipped with meters described by the Regulation 14 Technical Standards, a minimum of the coin-in, coin drop and bill-in meter information is transmitted to the system, unless this requirement is waived by the chairman pursuant to Regulation 6.045? (c) For any slot machines equipped with cashless wagering meters, the applicable cashless wagering meter information is transmitted to the cashless wagering system, unless this requirement is waived by the chairman? Slots MICS #121 77. Does the system maintain a list of slot machines not permanently connected to the on-line slot metering system and/or cashless wagering system along with the reason the slot machine is not permanently connected? Also, separately on this list are the slot machines connected to the on-line slot metering system that do not have all of the 02/17/06 Page 10 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments required meters for slot machines approved before 2/1/04 included? Slots MICS #122 78. For systems that read the specific values indicated on slot machine meters, are all required meters read, recorded and maintained by the on-line slot metering system before and after any slot machine maintenance that involves the clearing or resetting of the meters? Slots MICS #123 79. Does the OSMS produce the following reports: (a) Meter drop vs. actual drop for each drop type (coin and bills), by machine and in total? TS 3.140(3) (b) Meter attendant paid jackpots, cancelled credits, progressive payouts and external bonus payouts (in total) vs. actual attendant paid jackpots, cancelled credits, progressive payouts and external bonus payouts (in total)? TS 3.140(4) (c) A report (by machine and in total) that compares each type of attendant pay for those machines that have variances? TS 3.140(4) Note (d) Meter fills vs. actual fills (Note: Meter fills equal “Meter physical coin in” - “Meter physical coin out” - “Meter coin drop”.)? TS 3.140(5) (e) Meter machine paid and attendant paid external bonus payouts vs. external bonusing system machine paid and attendant paid external bonus payouts? TS 3.140(6) (f) Meter voucher out vs. system payout receipts issued? TS 3.140(7) (g) System payout receipts redeemed, by cashiering station, by shift? TS 3.140(8) (h) System payout receipts issued, to include date issued, amount, sequence number and identification of gaming device where issued? TS 3.140(9) (i) System payout receipt liabilities, by date issued and receipt sequence number? TS 3.140(10) (j) Meter win vs. actual taxable win. [Note: “Meter win” equals “meter coin in” (-) “meter coin out” (-) “meter machine paid progressive payout” (-) “meter machine paid external bonus payout” (-) “total of meters accumulating attendant payouts” (excluding attendant paid cancelled credits)]? TS 3.140(11) (k) In the event data or parameters are changed, an exception report to document: (1) Data or parameter altered; (2) Data or parameter value prior to alteration; (3) Data or parameter value after alteration; (4) Date and time of alteration; and (5) Identification of user that performed alteration TS 3.140(12) (l) By machine, a report of all required meter amounts read and recorded by the on-line slot system? TS 3.140(13) 80. Is the documentation generated by the CWS created daily and on demand? TS 3.160 81. Is the documentation created by the CWS available on a day, month, year-to-date basis and for at least a previous “two-year cumulative” basis? TS 3.160 82. Does the CWS include the following information for each document: (a) Document title; (b) Version number of the current system software; 02/17/06 Page 11 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments (c) Date or time period of activity; and (d) Date and time the document was generated? TS 3.160(1) 83. 02/17/06 Is the CWS capable of producing the following reports: (a) Wagering instrument issuances by date and identification of gaming device where issued, by gaming device? TS 3.160(2) (b) Wagering instrument redemptions by date and means of redemption (e.g., gaming device, cashier station, kiosk, etc.) TS 3.160(3) (c) Wagering instrument liabilities by date issued and by instrument sequence number? TS 3.160(4) (d) Wagering instruments expired by date issued, sequence number and identification of gaming device where issued? TS 3.160(5) & Slots MICS #186 (e) Wagering instruments voided by date issued, instrument sequence number and identification of gaming device where issued? TS 3.160(6) (f) Debit instrument (i.e., wagering account) activity and balances, by patron and gaming device that includes the date and time of each transfer to or from each gaming device? TS 3.160(7) (g) Vouchers and coupons counted in the count room, by gaming device and by type of instrument? TS 3.160(8) (h) Gaming device meter EFT in vs. system EFT in? TS 3.160(9) (i) Gaming device meter WAT in vs. system WAT in? TS 3.160(10) (j) Gaming device meter WAT out vs. system WAT out? TS 3.160(11) (k) System promotional account activity and balances, by patron or by promotion, as applicable? TS 3.160(12) (l) System wagering account activity (deposits, transfers to and from gaming devices, withdrawals, adjustments) and balances, by wagering account? TS 3.160(13) (m) Gaming device meter cashable electronic promotion in vs. system cashable electronic promotion in? TS 3.160(14) (n) Gaming device meter cashable electronic promotion out vs. system cashable electronic promotion out? TS 3.160(15) (o) Gaming device meter non-cashable electronic promotion in vs. system non-cashable electronic promotion in? TS 3.160(16) (p) Gaming device meter non-cashable electronic promotion out vs. system non-cashable electronic promotion out? TS 3.160(17) (q) Gaming device meter voucher in vs. system voucher in forms accepted? TS 3.160(18) (r) System voucher in vs. vouchers counted in the count room, by gaming device? TS 3.160(19) (s) Gaming device meter voucher out vs. system voucher out forms issued? TS 3.160(20) (t) Gaming device meter coupon promotion in vs. system coupon promotion in forms accepted? TS 3.160(21) (u) System coupon promotion in vs. coupons counted in the count room, by gaming device? TS 3.160(22) (v) Gaming device meter coupon promotion out vs. system coupon promotion out forms issued? TS 3.160(23) (w) For each individual adjustment made to a cashless wagering account or a promotional account, a summary Page 12 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments of the adjustment to include: (1) Patron name and account number, or specific promotion, as applicable? TS 3.160(25)(a) (2) Amount of, and explanation for, the adjustment? TS 3.160(25)(b) (3) Identification of the user completing and/or authorizing the adjustment? TS 3.160(25)(c) (x) All cashiering activities (e.g., log on, redemptions, deposits/withdrawals and adjustments to wagering accounts, log off, etc.), by cashier? TS 3.160(26) & Slots MICS #84 (y) All exceptions to include: (1) Date and time of exception? TS 3.160(27)(a) (2) Gaming device number or user identification number and terminal location where the exception occurred? TS 3.160(27)(b) (3) A description of the exception or a unique code that identifies the Exception? TS 3.160(27)(c) 84. Does the system create the following slot machine performance reports, as applicable, for each day for slot machines that have not been dropped (hard or soft): (a) Meter attendant paid jackpots, cancelled credits, progressive payouts and external bonus payouts (in total) vs. actual attendant paid jackpots, cancelled credits, progressive payouts and external bonus payouts (in total)? (b) Meter fills vs. actual fills? (c) Meter machine paid and attendant paid external bonus payouts vs. external bonusing system machine paid and attendant paid external bonus payouts? (d) Gaming device meter wagering account transfer (WAT) in vs. system wagering account transfer (WAT) in? (e) Gaming device meter wagering account transfer (WAT) out vs. system wagering account transfer (WAT) out? (f) Gaming device meter electronic funds transfer (EFT) in vs. system electronic funds transfer (EFT) in? (g) Gaming device meter cashable electronic promotion in vs. system cashable electronic promotion in? (h) Gaming device meter cashable electronic promotion out vs. system cashable electronic promotion out? (i) Gaming device meter non-cashable electronic promotion in vs. system non-cashable electronic promotion in? (j) Gaming device meter non-cashable electronic promotion out vs. system non-cashable electronic promotion out? (k) Meter voucher out vs. system voucher and payout receipt forms issued? (l) Gaming device meter coupon promotion out vs. system coupon promotion out forms issued? Slots MICS #130 85. 02/17/06 In addition to the slot machine performance reports under MICS #130, does the system create the following reports for each drop (hard or soft) date, by machine and in total: (a) Meter drop vs. actual drop for each drop type (e.g., coin and bills)? (b) System wagering instruments accepted vs. wagering instruments counted in the count room (e.g., vouchers and coupons)? (c) Meter win vs. actual taxable win? (d) Gaming device meter voucher in vs. system voucher in Page 13 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments forms accepted? (d) Gaming device meter coupon promotion in vs. system coupon promotion in forms accepted? Slots MICS #131 86. If so designed, are variances, by slot machine, noted in the reports required by Slots MICS #130 and #131 that are in excess of the following parameters flagged by the system: (a) Variances in excess of one percent or $100, whichever amount is greater, for each drop type (coin, bills, vouchers and coupons)? (b) Variances in excess of one percent or $100, whichever amount is greater, for the total of attendant payouts? (c) Variances in excess of one standard hopper fill dollar amount for fills? (d) Variances in excess of one percent or $100, whichever amount is greater, for win? (e) Any variance noted between gaming device meters and system meters for wagering account transfers (WAT) in and out, electronic funds transfer (EFT) in, cashable electronic promotion in and out, non-cashable electronic promotion in and out, external bonus payouts, vouchers out and coupon promotion out? Slots MICS #132 Note: As of the date of this checklist, electronic funds transfers are not allowed pursuant to Regulations 14.260 and 14.290. Therefore, this question is only applicable to the other meters mentioned in this standard. 87. Are the results of the variance investigation, including the date of and personnel involved in the investigations, documented in the appropriate report and retained? Slots MICS #133 Notes: The results shall also include any corrective action taken (e.g., meter replaced, interface component repaired, software debugged, etc.). Material attendant payout variances noted may be due to an attendant paid progressive jackpot payout amount or widearea progressive payout amount not being recorded on the gaming device attendant paid progressive payout meter. The gaming device attendant paid progressive payout meter may not have the capability to obtain the dollar amount of the progressive amount displayed on the progressive sign. If the variance is due to a progressive jackpot payout the investigation should include the review of the daily progressive payoff dollar amounts recorded pursuant to Regulation 5.110 to determine that the decrease is reasonably equivalent to the actual progressive jackpot payout dollar amount. For a wide-area progressive payout the investigation should include the review of the report of payouts from the operator of the wide-area progressive system. 88. Coin drop count must be recorded by hand or mechanically printed by the weigh scale. If a weigh scale interface is used, are the coin drop figures transferred via direct line or computer storage media to the OSMS? Slots MICS #15a & #16 89. If the OSMS records coin transfers during the hard 02/17/06 Page 14 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments count/wrap procedures is a multi-part form created evidencing the transfer? Slots MICS #23 90. Does the system record and create a document that lists the beginning inventory of a non-segregated coin and count room? Slots MICS #25b 91. Upon completion of the wrap in a non-segregated coin and count room: (a) Does the system create a summary report which evidences the calculation of the final wrap by subtracting the beginning inventory from the sum of the ending inventory and transfers in and out of the coin room? Slots MICS #26(b) (b) Does the system compare the final wrap and transfers, if applicable, to the weigh/count in total and by denomination, recording the comparison and noting any variances in the summary report? Slots MICS #26(c) (c) Does the system record the independent count performed by an employee of the cage/vault department of the ending coin room inventory by denomination and reconcile it to the beginning inventory, wrap, transfers and weigh/count? Are any reconciliation variances documented? Slots MICS #26(d) 92. Upon completion of the wrap in a segregated count room: (a) Does the system create a summary report which evidences the final count figure, in total and by denomination? Slots MICS #27(b) (b) Does the system compare the final wrap and transfers, if applicable, to the weigh/count in total and by denomination, recording the comparison and noting any variances in the summary report? Slots MICS #27(c) (c) Does the system record the independent count performed by an employee of the cage/vault department of the wrap, transfers and weigh/count? Are any reconciliation variances documented? Slots MICS #27(d) 93. If a weigh scale interface is used, are corrections to coin count data made using one of the following methods: (a) Crossing out the error on the document, entering the correct figure, and then obtaining the initials of at least two count team members who verified the change. If this procedure is used, must an employee independent of the slot department and count team enter the correct figure into the OSMS prior to the generation of related slot reports? Slots MICS #30a (b) During the count process, correct the error in the OSMS and enter the passwords of at least two count team members. If this procedure is used, an exception report is generated by the computer system identifying the slot machine number, the error, the correction and the count team members attesting to the propriety of the correction? Slots MICS #30b 94. If a currency counter interface is used, is it restricted so as to prevent unauthorized access (passwords, keys, etc.)? Slots MICS #40 95. If a currency counter interface is used, are the currency drop figures, from each machine and in total for each denomination, transferred to the system via direct line or 02/17/06 Page 15 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments computer storage media? Slots MICS #44 96. Does the CWS create a report that indicates the wagering instruments counted by machine and in total? Slot MICS #45 97. If the system uses a currency counter interface are corrections to count data made using one of the following methods: (a) Crossing out the error on the document, entering the correct figure, and then obtaining the initials of at least two count team members who verified the change? If this procedure is used, must an employee independent of the slot department and count team enter the correct figure into the computer system prior to the generation of related slot reports? Slots MICS #49a (b) During the count process, correct the error in the computer system and enter the passwords of at least two count team member? If this procedure is used, an exception report is generated by the computer system identifying the slot machine number, the error, the correction and the count team members attesting to the propriety of the correction? Slots MICS #49b 98. If the system records currency transfers during the soft count procedures is a multi-part form created evidencing the transfer? Slots MICS #50 99. For jackpot payouts, short pays exceeding $10, payouts of cancelled credits, and slot fills, do the payout forms/documentation (minimum two-part form) created by the OSMS include the following information: (a) Date and time? (b) Machine number? (c) Dollar amount of cash payout or slot fill (both alpha and numeric), or description of personal property awarded? Note: Alpha is optional if another unalterable method is used for evidencing the amount of the payout or fill. (d) Game outcome (including reel symbols, card values and suits, etc.) for jackpot payouts only. Note: Stating “multi-line payout” is adequate as the game outcome recorded on the jackpot payout form. (e) Signatures of at least two employees verifying and witnessing the payout or fill. Note: For approved computerized slot payout systems that initiate, validate, and print the dollar amount of the jackpot payout on the computer-generated form, only one employee signature verifying and witnessing the jackpot payout is required on the payout form for a jackpot payout amount of less than $1,200. For jackpot payouts of $1,200 or more and in other situations that allow an employee to input or change the dollar amount of the jackpot payout by more than $1 in the computer system, two employees must be physically involved in verifying and witnessing the payout. Slots MICS 59e Note (f) Preprinted or concurrently-printed sequential number. (g) The type of payout (e.g., slot machine jackpot, fill, cancelled credits, short pay, external bonus, and 02/17/06 Page 16 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments external progressive). Slots MICS #59 100. For payouts over a predetermined amount not to exceed $50,000, does the system require the authorization of a supervisory or management employee independent of the slot department? Slots MICS #60 101. For short pays of $10 or less paid from an employee’s bank, does the payout form or log (single-part form is acceptable) created by the system include: (a) Date and time? (b) Machine number? (c) Dollar amount of payout (both alpha and numeric)? Note: Alpha is optional if another unalterable method is used for evidencing the amount of the payout. (d) Signature of employee making the payout? (e) Reason for payout (e.g., short pay)? Slots MICS #61 102. Are promotional payouts that are either deducted from gross gaming revenue, or are greater than or equal to $100 and not deducted from gross gaming revenue, documented by the system on a slot payout form to include the following: (a) Date and time? (b) Machine number? (c) Dollar amount of payout or description of personal property (e.g., jacket, toaster, car, etc.)? (d) Reason for payout (e.g., double jackpots, four-of-a-kind bonus, etc.)? (e) Signature(s) of the following number of employees verifying, authorizing, and completing the promotional payout? (1) Two employee signatures for all payouts of $100 or more; or (2) One employee signature for payouts of less than $100 that are deducted from gross gaming revenue? Slots MICS #63 103. If a promotional cash payout is less than $100 and is not deducted from gross gaming revenue, is documentation created by the OSMS to support the decrease in bank accountability? Slots MICS #64 104. When a sequentially-numbered payout form is voided, is the initial transaction voided in the OSMS? Slots MICS #65 105. If the OSMS creates computerized payouts, including jackpots, fills, cancelled credits, short pays in excess of $10 and promotional payouts in excess of $100, are they controlled and completed in a manner that precludes any one individual from initiating and producing a fraudulent payout form, obtaining the funds, forging signatures on the payout form, routing all parts of the form, and misappropriating the funds? Acceptable procedures in meeting the requirements of this standard include the following: (a) Funds are issued either to a second verifier of the payout (i.e., someone other than the individual who generated/requested the ticket) or to two individuals concurrently (i.e., the generator/requestor of the form and the verifier of the payout). Both individuals witness 02/17/06 Page 17 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments the payout, or (b) The routing of one part of the completed form is under the physical control (e.g., dropped in a locked box) of an individual other than the individual that obtained/issued the funds and the individual that obtained/issued the funds must not be able to place the form in the locked box, or (c) Some other procedure which provides at least the same level of control as provided by (a) or (b) above. Slots MICS #67 As referred to at MICS #59(e), for a computerized system, only one individual is required to witness, verify, and complete the jackpot payout transaction when the computer system validates, initiates, and prints the dollar amount of less than $1,200 on the form. For jackpot payouts of $1,200 or more and in other situations that allow an individual to input or change the dollar amount of the jackpot payout by more than $1 in the computer system, two individuals must be physically involved in verifying and witnessing the payout as described above. Slots MICS #67 Note 2 Note: The following two standards apply when a fill is maintained in a slot fill cabinet that is used to replenish the slot machine hopper when empty. 106. If so designed, does the OSMS record and generate a report indicating the person’s name, date, time and purpose for each opening of the slot fill cabinet door when a hopper fill is performed by one person? And, does the OSMS initiate and validate the fill transaction and print the dollar amount of the fill on the computerized payout form? Slots MICS #68 “Note” 107. If so designed, does the OSMS produce cage or booth transfer forms to be used for fill cabinet transfers? Slots MICS #71 108. Prior to making payment on a wagering instrument, does the CWS verify the validity of the instrument? Slots MICS #72 Note: An employee cannot verify the validity of the wagering instrument by inserting it into a slot machine bill validator. 109. When a wagering instrument is paid during a period of system failure without system validation, does the CWS allow for the entry of instruments into the system? Slots MICS #74 110. Does the CWS allow supervisory personnel to review the applicable system records to verify the validity of wagering instruments of $50 or more that were lost, stolen, mutilated or expired that cannot be validated by the cashless wagering system? Slots MICS #75 111. Does the system then allow that the payment of the wagering instrument to be entered into the CWS at the time the instrument is paid? Slots MICS #75 112. Is the CWS configured such that unredeemed wagering instruments can only be voided in the cashless wagering system by personnel independent of the slot department? 02/17/06 Page 18 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments Slots MICS #76 113. Does the system create (not to be confused with documentation created by a redemption machine) information sufficient to reconcile the cash remaining in each wagering instrument redemption machine to the beginning cash placed in the machine less the wagering instruments and payout receipts redeemed? Slots MICS #77b Note: A payout receipt system issues a receipt/report for cancelled credits that may not be rewagered and therefore is not a cashless wagering system. Some systems print a receipt only at the slot machine, while others only print a report at a printer station that is located within a cashier’s area (including cage, booth, change banks, etc.). The following three steps refer to payout receipts. 114. If so designed to create payout receipts, does the system verify the validity of payout receipts through the payout receipt system? Slots MICS #78 115. If so designed to create payout receipts, when a payout receipt is paid during a period of system failure without system validation, does the system allow for the entry of instruments into the system when the system resumes operation? Slots MICS #80 116. If so designed to create payout receipts, does the system generate a report at a printer in a cashier station that can be used for shift-end reconciliation procedures? Slots MICS #82d 117. Does the cashless wagering system generate reports that indicate the dollar amount of active wagering instruments and wagering account transactions (i.e., deposits, withdrawals, and account adjustments) that should be reflected in each cashier’s accountability (includes the main cage). Slots MICS #84 Note: Such reports are utilized at the conclusion of each shift in the reconciling of funds. 118. Does the system maintain records for each machine which indicate: (a) The date the machine was placed into service? (b) The date the machine was removed from operation? (c) The date the machine was placed back into operation? (d) Any changes in machine numbers and designations? Slots MICS #95 119. Is the OSMS utilized to complete the following procedures that apply only to multi-game and multi-denomination/multigame machines and for slot machines which have a difference in theoretical hold percentage which exceeds 4 percent for a single-coin play versus maximum-bet play: (a) Is the total coin-in meter recorded weekly? (b) Are the coin-in meters for each paytable within all games of the slot machine and the coin-in meters of the slot machines that contain the number of plays by wager (i.e., one coin, two coins, etc.) recorded quarterly? 02/17/06 Page 19 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments Note: The coin-in meter for each denomination within a game is recorded if a different paytable (resulting in a different theoretical hold percentage) is activated for each denomination within a game? (c) Is the theoretical hold percentage adjusted at least annually to a weighted average based upon the ratio of coin-in for each paytable in play and based on the distribution of play by wager type during the year and is the new weighted average percentage included in the fiscal year end slot analysis report? Note: The adjusted theoretical hold percentage can be combined for machines with exactly the same paytable mix throughout the year using a weighted average of the adjusted percentages. Slots MICS #101 120. For payout receipt systems: (a) Are the slot machine voucher out electronic (soft) meter readings recorded when the slot machine is dropped? (b) Are the voucher out electronic (soft) meter readings, by slot machine, documented and maintained? Slots MICS #107 121. Can in-meter errors be corrected prior to creation of the final statistical report by the system? Slots MICS #109 122. For each wagering account established, does the CWS record: (a) The patron’s name or other unique identifier of the patron, if requested by patron? (b) Type of identification credential, credential number, expiration date of credential, and date credential was examined? (c) The dollar amount of the patron’s initial deposit? (d) The patron’s slot wagering account number? (e) The date the patron’s account is opened? Slots MICS #152c 123. Prior to the patron making a cash withdrawal from a wagering account, does the CWS allow the cashier the ability to verify the identity of the patron and availability of funds through the cashless wagering system? Slots MICS #154 124. Is a wagering account deposit/withdrawal, other than through actual slot machine play, evidenced by at least a two-part document, with one part for the patron when a deposit or withdrawal is made? Slots MICS #155 125. Are adjustments to a patron’s wagering account also documented and maintained? Slots MICS #155 126. Does the documentation addressed in the previous two questions contain: (a) Same document number on all copies? (b) Patron’s name or other unique identifier of the patron, account number, and signature? Note: Adjustments to the wagering account do not require the patron’s signature. (c) Date of deposit/withdrawal or account adjustment? 02/17/06 Page 20 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments (d) Dollar amount of deposit/withdrawal or account adjustment? (e) Nature of deposit/withdrawal (e.g. cash, check, chips)? (f) Reason for adjustment to wagering account, if applicable? (g) Signature of employee handling the transaction? Slots MICS #156 127. Does the CWS only allow adjustments to wagering accounts by authorized personnel? Slots MICS #157 & IT MICS #4 128. Are procedures established within the CMS to maintain a detailed record for each patron’s wagering account that includes: (a) The dollar amount of all funds deposited? (b) The dollar amount of all funds withdrawn? (c) Account adjustments made? (d) Transfers made to and from slot machines? TS 3.160(26) & Slots MICS #158 129. Is a report generated by shift that details the beginning and ending balance of wagering accounts, adjustment documentation, and wagering account transfers (per the CWS). Slots MICS #159a 130. Are all slot wagering account deposits/withdrawals, account adjustments, and wagering account transfers to/from slot machines summarized in total on an accountability form on at least a per shift basis? Slots MICS #160 131. Is slot department wagering account revenue (transfers to slot machines less transfers from slot machines) summarized and posted as a single line item on an accountability form on at least a daily basis? Slots MICS #161 132. Are player tracking, promotional accounts, promotion and external bonusing systems secured so as to prevent unauthorized access (e.g., quarterly changing of passwords, etc.)? Slots MICS #163 & IT MICS #4 133. Is the system designed so that the addition/deletion of points to player tracking accounts and the addition/deletion of cashable credits and noncashable credits to promotional accounts other than through actual slot machine play is sufficiently documented (including substantiation of reasons for increases) and authorized/performed by supervisory personnel of the player tracking, promotions, or slot department? Note: This standard does not apply to the deletion of points related to inactive or closed accounts through an automated process. Slots MICS #164 & IT MICS #4 134. 02/17/06 If wagering instruments are issued, through other than actual slot machine play or through the purchase of wagering instruments by the patron at a cashier’s station: (a) Is the transaction sufficiently documented and authorized by management personnel independent of the slot department?, or (b) If a slot supervisory employee authorizes the issuance of the wagering instruments, is sufficient documentation generated so that employees Page 21 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments independent of the slot department can randomly verify the issuance? Slots MICS #165 135. If the system includes player tracking, does the system restrict the access of employees who redeem points for members so they cannot have access to inactive or closed accounts without supervisory personnel authorization? Slots MICS #166 & IT MICS #4 136. If the system includes player tracking, are changes to the player tracking system parameters, such as point structures and employee access, performed in one of the following two methods: (a) Are they performed by supervisory employees independent of the slot department? (b) Are they performed by slot supervisory employees if sufficient documentation is generated and the propriety of the changes are randomly verified by supervisory employees independent of the slot department on a monthly basis? Slots MICS #168 & IT MICS #4 137. If the CWS supports promotional accounts, promotions and external bonusing: (a) Do changes to system parameters such as the awarding of bonuses, the issuance of cashable credits, noncashable credits, wagering instruments and employee access, require they be performed by supervisory employees independent of the slot department? (b) Alternatively, changes to promotional accounts, promotion and external bonusing system parameters may be performed by slot supervisory employees if sufficient documentation is generated and the propriety of the changes are randomly verified by supervisory employees independent of the slot department on a monthly basis? Slots MICS #169 & IT MICS #4 (c) Are all other changes to the player tracking, promotional accounts, promotion and external bonusing systems appropriately documented? Slots MICS #170 138. If the system supports contests/tournaments, are entry fees and prize payouts summarized at least monthly on an accountability document daily? Slots MICS #171 And is the following information recorded on a document: (a) Patron’s name? (b) Date of entry/payout? (c) Dollar amount of entry fee/payout (both alpha and numeric)? (d) Signature or initials of individuals completing transaction? (e) Name of contest/tournament? Slots MICS #172 139. If the system supports contests/tournaments, are the contest/tournament fees and payouts summarized at least monthly for posting to the accounting records? Slots MICS #173 140. If the system includes computerized player tracking, 02/17/06 Page 22 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass Fail N/A Comments promotional accounts, promotion and external bonusing slot systems (in-house and vendor systems) can all system configuration parameters be reviewed? Slots MICS #179 141. If the system calculates gross gaming revenue on the accrual basis (e.g., currency/wagering instrument drop is computed using bill-in/voucher-in meters for those machines not dropped at the end of the month):, (a) Is a system report created that supports the end-ofmonth accrued metered drop dollar amount by machine? Slots MICS #187b (b) Can the system prepare a reconciliation report for all slot machines in total that reflects reported NGC-31 drop as follows: actual drop for the current period plus accrued metered drop for the current period minus accrued metered drop from the previous period? Slots MICS #187f 142. Are the components of the above gross gaming revenue in compliance with the definitions at NRS 463.0161, NRS 463.3715(1), (2), (3) & (5) and Regulation 6.110(2), (6) (8) & (11)? 143. If the system validates and cancels a winning mail pay ticket within the system as a mail pay, is a log created: (a) That indicated the payout was through the mail? (b) The date received? (c) The Patron’s name? (d) Wagering voucher/payout receipt number? (e) Dollar amount? Slots MIC #203 144. Does the computer system validate & cancel a winning mail pay wagering instruments within the system as a mail pay? Slots MICS #204 TEST OF TRANSACTIONS Set Up: 145. Obtain a list of known issues, if any, from the manufacturer and determine if those issues have an impact on testing. 146. Determine if the review of the system manual and release notes will require any additional test procedures. 147. Set up six games with the following mix: 1. Four 1¢ denomination machines. One to be SAS 5. Three to be SAS 6 and one of those to be multi-game (max 3 active sub games). 2. One SAS 6 5¢ denomination multi-game machine (max 3 active sub games). 3. One SAS 6 game not a multi-game. 4. At a minimum, two of the six machines are to have coin hoppers. 5. One of the machines is to have a difference in theoretical hold percentage exceeding 4% spread between the minimum and maximum theoretical hold. Note: Only machine platforms that have been previously approved by the Gaming Control Board for use on this system are to be used for testing. Document the platform and game information for the machines included in testing. 02/17/06 Page 23 of 28 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com Auditors’ Initials and Date NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST SLOT SYSTEMS Manufacturer: Review Date(s): System: Auditor(s): Version: Account #: Project #: Pass 148. Set up promotional events, cashable and non-cashable, some of which will expire during the test period. Determine the types of promotional events available based on the system functionality. Set up one of each type at a minimum. Enroll all players to the events. 151. Set up external bonus events, cashabl