SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF -------------------------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, Index No.: -against- REARGUMENT ORDER Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------X J.: Plaintiff / Defendant moves to reargue this courts prior order dated whichprovides, in relevant part, . The plaintiff / defendant opposes the motion. CPLR 2221 governs motions affecting prior orders. In this case, plaintiff / defendant seeks to reargue the courts order. A motion to reargue seeks to convince the court at it overlooked or mth isapprehended relevant factsor misapplied relevant law. Its purpose is not to permit a party to reargue once again the very questions the st court has already decided. Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558 (1 Dept. 1979). In the present case, the plaintiff / defendant fails to establish that the court has olooked or mver isapprehended relevant facts ormisapplied relevant law. Accordinglyplaintiff /, defendants motion is denied. All matters not decided herein are hereby denied. This constitutes the decision and order of the court. Dated: Justice Supreme Court Reargument Order September 2004 American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com