Download Free Print-Only PDF OR Purchase Interactive PDF Version of this Form
Felony Judgment Findings Of Aggravating And Mitigating Factors Form. This is a North Carolina form and can be use in Criminal Statewide.
Tags: Felony Judgment Findings Of Aggravating And Mitigating Factors, CR-605, North Carolina Statewide, Criminal
en-USFile No. en-USFELONY JUDGMENTen-US en-USFINDINGS OF AGGRAVATINGen-US en-USAND MITIGATING FACTORSen-US en-US(STRUCTURED SENTENCING)en-USG.S. 15A-1340.16en-USName Of Defendant en-USOffense en-USSTATE VERSUS en-USIn The General Court Of Justice en-US District en-US Superior Court Divisionen-USMaterial opposite unmarked squares is to be disregarded as surplusage.en-US(Over) � 1. � The Defendant: � en-US a. induced others to participate in the commission of the offense.en-US en-US b. occupied a position of leadership or dominance of other participants in the commission of the offense. � 2. � The defendant joined with more than one other person in committing the offense and was not charged with committing a conspiracy. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US(check one)en-US en-US en-US(offenses committed Dec. 1, 1997 - Nov. 30, 2017) � � en-US en-US en-US(offenses committed on or after Dec. 1, 2017) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3. � The offense was committed for the purpose of: en-US a. avoiding or preventing a lawful arrest. en-US b. effecting an escape from custody. � 4. � The defendant was: en-US a. hired to commit the offense. en-US b. paid to commit the offense. � 5. � The offense was committed to: en-US a. disrupt en-US b. hinder the lawful exercise of a governmental function or the enforcement of laws. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US(Applies to offenses committed on or after December 1, 2009.) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8. � The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to more than one person by means of a weapon or device which would normally be en-UShazardous to the lives of more than one person. � 9. � � (select appropriate option depending on date of offense) en-US a. � en-US(use for offenses committed prior to December 1, 2012)en-US The defendant held public office at the time of the offense and the offense related to the en-USconduct of the office. � b. � en-US(use for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2012)en-US en-USThe defendant held public elected or appointed office or public employment at the time en-USof the offense and the offense directly related to the conduct of the office or employment.en-US en-US(en-USNOTE:en-US en-USThe court must notify the State Treasurer as en-USrequired by G.S. 15A-1340.16(f).en-US)en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US en-US(Applies to offenses committed on or after December 1, 2013.) � 10. � The defendant: en-US a. was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the crime. en-US b. used a deadly weapon at the time of the crime. � 11. � The victim was: en-US a. very young. en-US b. very old. en-US c. mentally infirm. en-US d. physically infirm. en-US e. handicapped. � 12. � The defendant committed the offense while on pretrial release on another charge. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-UScourt of this State to be in willful violation of the conditions of probation imposed pursuant to a suspended sentence or been found by the Post-Release en-USSupervision and Parole Commission to be in willful violation of a condition of parole or post-release supervision imposed pursuant to release from � � � � � � � � � � � en-US(Applies to offenses committed on or after December 1, 2008.) � 13. � The defendant involved a person under the age of 16 in the commission of the crime. � 13a. � en-US(for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2015) en-USThe defendant committed an offense and knew or reasonably should have known that a person en-USunder the age of 18 who was not involved in the commission of the offense was in a position to see or hear the offense. � 14. � The offense involved: en-US a. an attempted taking of property of great monetary value. en-US b. the actual taking of property of great monetary value.en-US en-US c. damage causing great monetary loss. en-US d. an unusually large quantity of contraband. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16. � The offense involved the sale or delivery of a controlled substance to a minor. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16b. � The offense is the manufacture of methamphetamine and was committed in a dwelling that is one of four or more contiguous dwellings. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US en-US The Court finds this aggravating factor beyond a reasonable doubt. � 19. � The victim of this offense suffered serious injury that is permanent and debilitating. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US(Applies to offenses committed on or after en-USOctober 1, 2013.) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US en-US(Applies to offenses committed on or after October 1, 2013.) � � � � � � � � en-USNOTE: � en-USen-USaggravating factors and mitigating factors should be made for each offense that is not consolidated. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The trier of fact finds these aggravating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. � There are no findings of any aggravating factors. en-USAGGRAVATING FACTORS en-USSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINAen-US en-US County American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com en-USMITIGATING FACTORS en-USDETERMINATION en-USName Of Presiding Judge (Type Or Print)en-USSignature Of Presiding Judgeen-USDate en-USMaterial opposite unmarked squares is to be disregarded as surplusage. � 1. � The defendant committed the offense under: en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2. � The defendant: en-US en-US a. was a passive participant in the commission of the offense.en-US en-US b. played a minor role in the commission of the offense. � 3. � The defendant was suffering from a: en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5. � The defendant has made: en-US en-US a. substantial restitution to the victim. en-US b. full restitution to the victim. � 6. � The victim was more than 16 years of age and: en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7. � The defendant: en-US en-US a. aided in the apprehension of another felon.en-US en-US b. testified truthfully on behalf of the State in another prosecution of a felony. � 8. � en-US a. The defendant acted under strong provocation.en-US en-US b. The relationship between the defendant and the victim was otherwise extenuating. � 9. � The defendant: en-US � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US en-US b. exercised caution to avoid serious bodily harm or fear to other persons. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US en-US a. at an early stage of the criminal process. en-US b. prior to arrest. � 12. � The defendant has been a person of good character or has had a good reputation in the community in which the defendant lives. � 13. � The defendant is a minor and has reliable supervision available. � 14. � The defendant has been honorably discharged from the United States Armed Services. � � � � � � � � � � � 16. � The defendant has entered and is currently involved in or has successfully completed a drug treatment program or an alcohol treatment program en-USsubsequent to arrest and prior to trial. � � � � � � � 18. � The defendant has a support system in the community. � 19. � The defendant has a positive employment history or is gainfully employed. � 20. � The defendant has a good treatment prognosis and a workable treatment plan is available. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1. � The Court finds that: en-US � the State provided the defendant with appropriate notice of the aggravating factor(s) in this case. en-US � the defendant waived any notice requirements as to the aggravating factor(s) in this case. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � en-US � fi