ORDER FOR LESS RESTRICTIVE TERMS - Page 1 of 2 (SAPO 10/2016) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF Petitioner Case No: (Parent/Guardian of Minor Petitioner) ORDER FOR LESS (use full names) RESTRICTIVE TERMS (Sexual Abuse Protective Order) v. EX PARTE Respondent (full name of person restrained) This matter came before the Court on Petitioner222s Motion and Declaration for Less Restrictive Terms. The Court has considered Petitioner222s motion and declaration. THE COURT ORDERS THAT: Petitioner222s Motion is granted based on a finding of good cause. The terms of the Protective Order to Prevent Sexual Abuse are modified as described in the attached Motion and Declaration for Less Restrictive Terms. Petitioner222s Motion is granted in part, based on a finding of good cause, as follows: Petitioner222s Motion is denied. Judge Signature: NOTICE TO RESPONDENT All terms of the Sexual Abuse Protective Order previously ordered remain in effect, except as changed here. The changes are effective now. Violation of this Sexual Abuse Protective Order may result in your arrest and in civil and/or criminal penalties. This Order is enforceable in every county in Oregon, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and all tribal lands and territories of the United States. Review this Order carefully. An attached Notice informs you that you may request a hearing if you DISAGREE with any of these less restrictive terms. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com (SAPO 08/2019) The proposed order is ready for judicial signature under UTCR 5.100 because service of this order is not required by statute, rule, or otherwise. Submitted by: Date Signature of Petitioner, Parent or Guardian of Minor Petitioner Print Name, Petitioner, Parent or Guardian of Minor Petitioner Attorney for Petitioner OSB No. (if applicable) Contact Address City, State, Zip Contact Telephone Number Use Safe Contact Address Use Safe Contact Number ORDER FOR LESS RESTRICTIVE TERMS - Page 2 of 2 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com