Superior Court of Washington, County of In re: Petitioner/s (person/s who started this case): No. Order on Motion to Adjust Child Support Order (ORAS) And Respondent/s (other party/parties): Order on Motion to Adjust Child Support Order 1. 2. 3. The court has considered the Motion to Adjust Child Support Order filed by (name): . Jurisdiction: The court has the authority to decide this case for these parties. Findings (check one): Child support should not be adjusted because: Child support should be adjusted because (check all that apply): Two years or more have passed ­ At least two full years (24 months) have passed since the current order was entered and any step increase took effect and (check all that apply): the parents' income has changed. the economic table or standards in RCW 26.19 have changed. Current order allows periodic adjustment ­ The current Child Support Order says support may be adjusted now. Other findings (if any): RCW 26.09.170 Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Modify 522 Order on Motion to Adjust Child Support Order p. 1 of 2 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com  Court Orders 4. The Motion to Adjust Child Support is (check one): Denied. The current final Child Support Order remains in effect. Granted. The court signed a new final Child Support Order and Worksheets filed separately today or on (date): . 5. Other orders (if any) Ordered. Date Judge or Commissioner Petitioner and Respondent or their lawyers fill out below: This document (check any that apply): is an agreement of the parties is presented by me may be signed by the court without notice to me This document (check any that apply): is an agreement of the parties is presented by me may be signed by the court without notice to me Petitioner signs here or lawyer signs here + WSBA # Respondent signs here or lawyer signs here + WSBA # Print Name Date Print Name Date RCW 26.09.170 Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Modify 522 Order on Motion to Adjust Child Support Order p. 2 of 2 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com