CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 315 Findings and Con clusions About Parentage p. 1 of 10 Superior Court of Washington, County of In re parentage: Petitioner (person who started this case) : And Respondents: ( parent / presumed parent / alleged parents) Children over age 2: No. Findings and Conclusions about Parentage (FNFCL) Findings and Conclusions about Parentage 1. Basis for findings and conclusions (check all that apply): Default Order or Summary Judgment Order (date): Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding Hearing on (date): Trial for this case on (date): , with the following people present (check all that apply): State of Washington, DSHS, through its lawyer (name): Birth Mother (name): Legal Guardian (name): Presumed Parent (name): Alleged Parent (name): Alleged Parent (name): Alleged Parent (name): Guardian ad Litem for ( names): Other (name and relationship to this case): Other (name and relationship to this case): Other (name and relationship to this case): American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 315 Findings and Con clusions About Parentage p. 2 of 10 The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 2. Notice and Personal Jurisdiction All people with a right to receive notice of this case were served with the Summons and Petition. except (name/s): . (Check all that apply): (Name/s) was/were served in this state. (Name/s) live/s in this state now. (Name/s) lived in this state with the children. (Name/s) lived in this state and paid for pregnancy costs or support for the children. (Name/s) did or said something that caused the children to live in this state. (Name/s) h ad sex in this state, which may have produced the children. (Name/s) signed an agreement to join this Petition or other document agreeing that the court can decide his or her rights in this case. None of the reasons listed above apply to (name): Other (specify): Conclusion: The court has personal jurisdiction over all parties to this case, except (name/s): . 3. Guardian ad Litem No Guardian ad Litem was appointed. The Court appointed (name): Guardian ad Litem (GAL) for . The court has considered the report and recommendations of the GAL about (check all that apply): Parentage Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule Other (specify): Other (specify): 4. Genetic Testing Admitted Does not apply. Either genetic testing was not done, or the results were not admitted. (Skip to 5.) This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on (date): . (Skip to 5.) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 315 Findings and Con clusions About Parentage p. 3 of 10 The following genetic testing results were admitted as evidence (check all that apply): Alleged Parent Tested Genetic paternity testing was done with a possible father (name): . The testing was done by (check one): court order. agreement of the Alleged Parent, Birth Mother and any Presumed, Acknowledged, or Adjudicated Parent. the alleged parent without a court order or agreement. The children have no Presumed, Acknowledged, or Adjudicated Parents. The test results (check one): show a 99% or greater probability that this Alleged Parent is the biological parent of . exclude this Alleged Parent is as a biological parent of . Presumed Parent Tested Genetic paternity testing was done with the Presumed Parent (name): . The testing was done by (check one): court order agreement of the Birth Mother and Presumed Parent. The test results (check one): show a 99% or greater probability that the Presumed Parent is the biological parent of . exclude the Presumed Parent as a biological parent of . Test Results Challenged The genetic paternity test results were challenged by (name): . The court concludes that the challenged test results (check one): are are not valid because (specify): Other (specify): Conclusion: (Check one): The court should decide parentage according to the genetic test results described above. The court should not decide parentage according to the genetic test results described above because the court found the test results are invalid. The court should not decide parentage according to the genetic test results described above based on the Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding hearing. See section 7. 5. Genetic Testing Not Admitted Does not apply. Genetic testing results were admitted. (Skip to 6.) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 315 Findings and Con clusions About Parentage p. 4 of 10 This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on (date): . (Skip to 6.) Genetic testing was not done, or the results were not admitted. Conclusion: (Check all that apply): Not Necessary Genetic testing was not necessary to decide parentage. (Name): should be declared the legal parent of because s/he is a/n (check all that apply): Acknowledged parent (parent who signed a Paternity Acknowledgment). Parent by admission (someone who admitted s/he was the parent in his/her court papers or in a hearing under penalty of perjury). Adoptive parent. Parent by assisted reproduction. Parent according to a surrogacy contract. Other findings (specify): Not Ordered The children have a Presumed, Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent. The court concludes that ordering genetic testing is not in the nd recommendation of the This conclusion is based on the following (check all that apply): See Order on Motion for Genetic Testing. (Describe clear and convincing evidence why testing is best interest): Not Admitted The children have a Presumed, Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent. Genetic testing results were not admitted because the testing was done without either a court order or agreement of the Birth Mother and the Presumed, Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent. No Cooperation (Name): did not cooperate with an order for genetic testing. This conclusion is based on the following facts (describe the failure to cooperate): Because this person did not cooperate with genetic testing, the court concludes that he (check one): should should not be the legal father of the children. RCW 26.26.575(2). This is in the cinterest because (explain): Other (specify): American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 315 Findings and Con clusions About Parentage p. 5 of 10 6. Presumed Parent There is no presumed parent. This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on (date): . Marriage / Domestic Partner Presumption (Name): was presumed by law to be a parent when this case started because of a marriage or domestic partnership. Conclusion: The court should: Disprove the presumed parent as a legal parent of because the presumed parent is not the biological parent according to the genetic test results described in section 4 above, and (check all that apply): The Petition was filed or served on or before 4th birthdays. The Petition was filed or served after 4th birthdays and the presumed parent: did not live with and did not have sex with the birth mother when the children were likely conceived, and did not openly hold out these children as his/her own children. Disprove the presumed parent as a legal parent of based on the Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding Hearing. (See section 7.) Confirm the presumed parent is a correct legal parent of because (check all that apply): The presumed parent is the biological parent according to the genetic test results described in section 4 above. testing. The Petition was first filed or served after 4th birthdays and the presumed paren t (check all that apply): lived with or had sex with the birth mother when the children were likely conceived. openly held out these children as his/her own children. Other (specify): Holding Out Presumption (Name): is claimed to be a presumed parent of because he/she had lived in the same home as these children and openly held them out as his/her own children for the firs