CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage (after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision) p. 1 of 8 Superior Court of Washington, County of In re parentage: Petitioner (person who started this case) : And Respondents (current legal parents) : Children over age 2: No. Findings and Conclusions about Parentage (after Acknowledgment or earlier Court Decision) (FNFCL) Findings and Conclusions about Parentage (after Acknowledgment or Earlier Court Decision) 1. Basis for findings and conclusions (check all that apply): Default Order or Summary Judgment Order (date): Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding Hearing on (date): Trial for this case on (date): , with the following people present (check all that apply): Petitioner (name): Respondent (name): Respondent (name): Guardian ad Litem for ( names): Other (name and relationship to this case): Other (name and relationship to this case): Other (name and relationship to this case): American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage (after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision) p. 2 of 8 The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 2. Notice and Personal Jurisdiction All people with a right to receive notice of this case were served with the Summons and Petition. except (name/s): . (Check all that apply): (Name/s) was/were served in this state. (Name/s) live/s in this state now. (Name/s) lived in this state with the children. (Name/s) lived in this state and paid for pregnancy costs or support for the children. (Name/s) did or said something that caused the children to live in this state. (Name/s) h ad sex in this state, which may have produced the children. (Name/s) signed an agreement to join this Petition or other document agreeing that the court can decide his or her rights in this case. None of the reasons listed above apply to (name): Other (specify): Conclusion: The court has personal jurisdiction over all parties to this case. except (name/s): . 3. Parentage originally established (Repeat this section for each child as needed.) By Court Order Parentage was established by court order for names): on (date): by (name of court): . Petitioner (check one): was was not included as a party in that court case. By Paternity Acknowledgment The Respondents signed a Paternity Acknowledgment (Affidavit) for that was filed with the appropriate agency of the state of on (date): . The mother was married or in a registered domestic partnership when the child was born (or within 300 days before). Her spouse/partner (name): signed a Denial of Paternity that was filed with the appropriate agency of the state of on (date) . Petitioner (check one): did did not sign that Paternity Acknowledgment Denial of Paternity. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage (after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision) p. 3 of 8 Conclusion: The Petitioner (check one): has the right to bring this case because he was not involved in the court order or acknowledgment that originally established parentage. does not have the right to bring this case because he was involved in the court order or acknowledgment that originally established parentage. The Petition should be denied. 4. Deadline to file Petition The Petition to Decide Parentage (after Acknowledgment or Court Decision) was first filed or served on (date): . This date is (check one): within four years of more than four years after: or the date a Paternity Acknowledgement was born after the Paternity Acknowledgement was filed). Conclusion: The Petition was filed (check one): before the four-year deadline. after the four-year deadline and should be denied. 5. Guardian ad Litem No Guardian ad Litem (GAL) was appointed. The Court appointed (name): Guardian ad Litem (GAL) for . The court has considered the report and recommendations of the GAL. The GAL should be discharged. Other (specify): 6. Genetic Testing Admitted Does not apply. Either genetic testing was not done, or the results were not admitted. (Skip to 7.) This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on (date): . (Skip to 7.) The following genetic testing results were admitted as evidence (check all that apply): Petitioner Tested Genetic paternity testing was done with the Petitioner (name): . The testing was done by (check one): court order. agreement with the Respondents. The test results (check one): show a 99% or greater probability that the Petitioner is the biological parent of . exclude Petitioner as a biological parent of . American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage (after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision) p. 4 of 8 Respondent Tested Genetic paternity testing was done with the Respondent (name): . The testing was done by (check one): court order agreement of the Respondents. The test results (check one): show a 99% or greater probability that this Respondent is the biological parent of : . exclude this Respondent as a biological parent of . Test Results Challenged The genetic paternity test results were challenged by (name): . The court concludes that the challenged test results (check one): are are not valid because (specify): Other (specify): Conclusion: (Check one): The court should decide parentage according to the genetic test results described above. The court should not decide parentage according to the genetic test results described above because the court found the test results are invalid. The court should not decide parentage according to the genetic test results described above based on the Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding Hearing. 7. Genetic Testing Not Admitted Does not apply. Genetic testing results were admitted. (Skip to 8.) This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on (date): . (Skip to 8.) Genetic testing was not done, or the results were not admitted. Conclusion: (Check all that apply): Not Ordered The children have an Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent. The court concludes that ordering genetic testing is not in the childrGuardian ad Litem. This conclusion is based on the following (check all that apply): See Order on Motion for Genetic Testing. (Describe clear and convincing evidence best interest): American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630 Mandatory Form (07/2017) FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage (after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision) p. 5 of 8 Not Admitted The children have an Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent. Genetic testing results were not admitted because the testing was done without either a court order or agreement of the Birth Mother and the Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent. No Cooperation (Name): did not cooperate with an order for genetic testing. This conclusion is based on the following facts (describe the failure to cooperate): Because this person did not cooperate with genetic testing, the court concludes that he (check one): should should not be the legal father of the children. interest because (explain): Other (specify): 8. as listed on the Final Parentage Order (after Acknowledgment or earlier Court Decision). 9. Jurisdiction over the children (RCW 26.27.201 .221, .231, .261, .271) The court can approve a Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule for these children and decide who the children should live with most of the time because (check all that apply; if Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction A Washington court has already made a custody order or parenting plan for the children, and the court still has authority to make other orders for . Home state jurisdiction te because (check all that apply): lived in Washington with a parent or someone acting as a parent for at least the 6 months just before this case was filed, or if the children were less than 6 months old when the case was filed, they had lived in Washington with a parent or