COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR No. Plaintiff vs. Defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Driving or Physical Control While Under the Influence of Intoxicants (DUIFFCL) FINDINGS OF FACT 1. JURISDICTION AND VENUE: This incident took place at _____________________________ , which is located within the City of _____________________________________________. 2. DATE OF INCIDENT: This incident took place on _______________________, _____, at _______ hrs. 3. PROBABLE CAUSE: The police officer had probable cause to stop or investigate defendant because ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________. 4. POSSIBLE INTOXICATION: The police officer determined, based on observation of driving observation of defendant field sobriety tests that defendant may have been intoxicated at the time he/she was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle. 5. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: Defendant’s rights and the impact of his/her actions were lawfully and properly explained to defendant. 6. BLOOD ALCOHOL MEASUREMENTS: Defendant’s blood alcohol was measured by BAC Datamaster in accordance with all procedures set forth by the State Toxicologist and the Washington State Patrol Blood test was __________________________ . 7. BLOOD ALCOHOL: Defendant’s blood alcohol, at the time of driving, as determined by Verifier Blood test was ________________________. 8. DRIVING IMPAIRED OR EFFECTED: At the time of arrest, defendant’s ability to operate a motor vehicle was significantly impaired as the result of intoxication, which is more fully shown in the police as is shown by testimony of witnesses at report, which is annexed hereto and incorporated by reference trial. 9. PASSENGERS: At the time of arrest, defendant was conveying ___________ passengers, of which _____ were children. Datamaster Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (DUIFFCL) - Page 1 of 2 CrRLJ 07.0300 - (12/2000) RCW 46.61.5055 2001 © American LegalNet, Inc. 10. PRIOR ALCOHOL RELATED TRAFFIC OFFENSES: Defendant has had ______________ prior DUI or Physical Control offenses, or other offenses wherein the charge was reduced from DUI or Physical Control. A true copy of Defendant’s Case History and Abstract of Driving Record, dated today, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 11. PLEA: Defendant has guilty by a jury. entered a guilty plea been found guilty after a bench trial been found CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. JURISDICTION AND VENUE are properly before the court. 2. DRIVING OR PHYSICAL CONTROL: Defendant is guilty of the crime of Driving Physical Control of a Motor Vehicle while Under the Influence of an Intoxicant. Being in actual DATED: Judge/Court Commissioner/Pro Tem Prosecutor Defendant/Defendant’s Attorney Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (DUIFFCL) - Page 2 of 2 RCW 46.61.5055; CrRLJ 07.0300 - (12/2000) 2001 © American LegalNet, Inc.