IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF _______________________________ COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA JUVENILE DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF: DOB: ______________ DOB: ______________ DOB: ______________ DOB: ______________ DOB: ______________ DOB: ______________ ) ) JD- _________________________________ ) ) Date: ______________________________ ) Judge: _____________________________ ) ) Alleged Deprived Child(ren). PERMANENCY / REVIEW ORDER NOW on this _____ day of _____________________, 20_____, the following appearances were made and proceedings held: APPEARANCES: State Mother Mother Father Father Father Father Legal Guardian Child Child Child Child Child Child Tribal Representative GAL/CASA Foster Parent or Placement Interpreter for Mother Father Other Court Reporter Other DHS Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorney Other Attorney Interpreter for Mother Father Other Other Other Minor child(ren) was/were placed out of home on the _____day of __________________, 20____. Permanency Review Order OK-J-UO-0005 Version 1.1.16.2 Page 1 of 8 OCIS Docket Code: (Permanency Hearing) OPREV (Review Hearing) OREV American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com FINDINGS AND ORDERS OF THE COURT The Court has reviewed the evidence, oral and written, submitted by the parties on this date including the testimony of witnesses, exhibits admitted into evidence, statements and arguments of counsel, reports and/or treatment plans of DHS, reports of service providers, reports of CASA or GAL, if appointed, and any previous orders of this Court, including the order of adjudication, to determine the safety of the child(ren), the continuing necessity and appropriateness of the placement(s), the extent of compliance by the participants with previous orders and treatment plans adopted by the court and the extent of progress toward achieving permanency for the child(ren) and HEREBY FINDS, ORDERS AND DECREES: I. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS A. REASONABLE EFFORTS A1. The continuation of all named child(ren)/or these specified child(ren) __________________________________________________ in the(ir) home is is not contrary to the welfare of the child(ren), to wit: ____________________________________________________________. AND Reasonable efforts have or have not been made to prevent the need for removal all named child(ren)/or these specified child(ren) ________________________________, of to wit: _____________________________________________________________________________________________; A2. Reasonable efforts have or have not been made to finalize the permanency plan and to place all named child(ren)/or these specified child(ren) _____________________________________________ in a timely manner in accordance with the plan, to wit: _____________________________________________________________________________________________. OR Reasonable efforts to reunite the child(ren) with the child(ren)'s family are not required pursuant to Title 10A O.S. �1-4-809 and a permanency hearing is set for _____________________________________________, if applicable. B. All named child(ren)/or these specified child(ren) ___________________________________ is/are age fourteen (14) or older and services are are not being provided to facilitate transition into successful adulthood, to wit: _________________________________________. C1. If siblings have been removed, reasonable efforts have have not been made to place the siblings together in the same placement, to wit: ____________________________________; AND C2. If siblings are separated, reasonable efforts have have not been made to provide for frequent visitation or other on-going interactions; have not been made, as it is contrary to the safety or well-being of the child or sibling because ________________________________________________________________________________________________. D. INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT and ACTIVE EFFORTS D1. The Indian Child Welfare Act does does not apply The name of the Tribe is: ________________________________________________. The Tribe and BIA, if tribe unknown, has been notified has not been notified. Other ________________________________________________________________________________________ Permanency Review Order OK-J-UO-0005 Version 1.1.16.2 Page 2 of 8 OCIS Docket Code: (Permanency Hearing) OPREV (Review Hearing) OREV American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com D2. If ICWA applies, active efforts to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian Family have have not been made have proven unsuccessful, to wit: ______________________________________________________________. AND D3. Placement has has not been made in accordance with the placement preferences set forth in 25 U.S.C. 1915. OR If applicable, good cause exists to deviate from the placement preferences, to wit: ____________________________________________________________________________________________. No ICWA compliant placement exists. II. INDIVIDUAL SERVICE PLAN Individual Service Plan ("ISP"), services and placement do do not meet special needs and best interest of child(ren) with child(ren)'s health, safety, and educational needs addressed. Additional services ordered are ______________________________________________________________ . All parties are Ordered to fully comply with the treatment plans approved by the Court. III. PERMANENCY PLAN The Court approves the permanency plan for all named children /or these specified children ______________________________________________________________________________ : A. Reunification B. Adoption C. Guardianship D. Planned permanent E. Out of home placement (check all applicable). living arrangement The Court finds DHS has documented a compelling reason that filing a motion/petition all named to terminate parental rights does not serve the best interests of children/or these specified children ______________________________________, to wit: _________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ . AND A. REUNIFICATION with a parent, legal guardian or custodian for all named child(ren)/or these specified child(ren) __________________________________________________ if: a. The parent(s) has/have made marked progress toward reunification; b. The parent(s) has/have complied with the terms of the treatment plan, and corrected the conditions which caused the child(ren) to be adjudica